2006
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2006.0379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscopy cantilever simulation by finite element methods for quantitative atomic force acoustic microscopy measurements

Abstract: Measurements of vibrational spectra of atomic force microscopy (AFM) microprobes in contact with a sample allow a good correlation between resonance frequencies shifts and the effective elastic modulus of the tip-sample system. In this work we use finite element methods for modeling the AFM microprobe vibration considering actual features of the cantilever geometry. This allowed us to predict the behavior of the cantilevers in contact with any sample for a wide range of effective tip-sample stiffness. Experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to an experimental SAM verification scheme that must make assumptions about the beam dynamics and contact mechanics, FEA allows the tip-sample contact to be simplified to a system of elastic springs. In principle, FEA could be used to directly calculate the contact stiffness from experimental contact resonance frequencies [21][22][23]. However, the variability amongst different cantilevers would necessitate a unique model for every cantilever used.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Analytical Analysis Of Higher-eigenmode Cr Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to an experimental SAM verification scheme that must make assumptions about the beam dynamics and contact mechanics, FEA allows the tip-sample contact to be simplified to a system of elastic springs. In principle, FEA could be used to directly calculate the contact stiffness from experimental contact resonance frequencies [21][22][23]. However, the variability amongst different cantilevers would necessitate a unique model for every cantilever used.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Analytical Analysis Of Higher-eigenmode Cr Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free resonance frequencies for the fitted experimental cantilever are compared with the experimental ones and with those obtained by using Finite Element Process (FEA) [36], see Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where a ∼ 11nm was obtained using the methodology by [46], M tip = 170.33GPa [36] and the proposed model, an indentation modulus mapping is obtained, see Figure 7. This mapping was computed using the results shown in Figure 6(c), (d), (e) and (f) and the database shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These resonance frequencies were fitted according to a database, which was computed using the free cantilever model described in Equation 21 and the particle swarm optimization algorithm [33][34][35][36], in order to obtain the geometrical parameters for the experimental cantilever. The database describes each cantilever according to length L, width a, thickness b, inertia moment I = ab 3 /12, linear mass m = ρA, where A is the crosssectional area of the cantilever and ρ = 2330 kg/m 3 [37] is the density of the cantilever. The database has 10000 cantilevers where L ∈ [440,500] µm, a ∈ [40,50] µm, b ∈ [1,3] µm.…”
Section: Transfer Function For a Cantilever In Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%