2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800129-5.00003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics in the Early Universe: From Recombination to Reionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 286 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important transition occurred earlier at even higher redshifts, when during the epoch of recombination the primordial plasma recombined and the universe became neutral, with atomic hydrogen, helium, and a small fraction of light elements. While the physics of the epoch of recombination is well understood from the theoretical point of view (Ali-Haïmoud & Hirata 2011;Chluba & Thomas 2011;Glover et al 2014) and constrained by observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (Calabrese et al 2013;Farhang et al 2013;Planck Collaboration et al 2016a), the EoR is relatively poorly understood. Among other aspects, the thermal evolution of baryons and nature of the first sources, the exact redshift and duration of reionization, and the dominant mechanisms that affect reionization are poorly constrained (Planck Collaboration et al 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important transition occurred earlier at even higher redshifts, when during the epoch of recombination the primordial plasma recombined and the universe became neutral, with atomic hydrogen, helium, and a small fraction of light elements. While the physics of the epoch of recombination is well understood from the theoretical point of view (Ali-Haïmoud & Hirata 2011;Chluba & Thomas 2011;Glover et al 2014) and constrained by observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (Calabrese et al 2013;Farhang et al 2013;Planck Collaboration et al 2016a), the EoR is relatively poorly understood. Among other aspects, the thermal evolution of baryons and nature of the first sources, the exact redshift and duration of reionization, and the dominant mechanisms that affect reionization are poorly constrained (Planck Collaboration et al 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out previously (e.g., Rubiño-Martín et al 2008;Chluba & Sunyaev 2010;Glover et al 2014), for the CRR one of the biggest uncertainty in the neutral helium model is due to the lack of data for the photoionization cross sections. For levels with n ≤ 10 and l ≤ 3, we use a combination of the sparse TopBase data (Cunto et al 1993) and pre-calculated recombination rates from Smits (1996).…”
Section: Photoionization Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, it is important to recall here that SSC rates have been used recently in CRR calculations (Chluba & Ali-Haïmoud 2016;Glover et al 2014), where a high precision of ∼ 0.1% is required (see Section 1). In Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%