1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-4368(96)00020-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic ordering and hardness of nonstoichiometric titanium carbide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This small a 0 value cannot be entirely attributed to non-stoichiometry of TiC phase. In fact, according to Lipatnikov et al [12] and to E. M. Fryt [13], TiC y ( y 1) lattice parameter tends to decrease with y to approximately 4.315 Å for TiC 0.6 . The relatively small value of the lattice parameter of as-deposited TiC must therefore mainly be result from residual compressive stress in the film.…”
Section: Xrd Of Interlayers Before and After Diamond Depositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This small a 0 value cannot be entirely attributed to non-stoichiometry of TiC phase. In fact, according to Lipatnikov et al [12] and to E. M. Fryt [13], TiC y ( y 1) lattice parameter tends to decrease with y to approximately 4.315 Å for TiC 0.6 . The relatively small value of the lattice parameter of as-deposited TiC must therefore mainly be result from residual compressive stress in the film.…”
Section: Xrd Of Interlayers Before and After Diamond Depositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The trigonal ordered phase was formed below 770 • C, while the cubic ordered phase was observed at higher temperatures. Lipatnikov et al 12 have reported that TiC 0.6 can form a disordered phase. In addition, they reported the presence of Ti 2 C with an ordered trigonal or cubic symmetry and another ordered Ti 3 C 2 phase with orthorhombic symmetry.…”
Section: Ti-c Equilibrium Phase Diagram and Crystal Structure Of Titamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, hardness did indeed exhibit a slight correlation with stoichiometry, and declined by roughly 15-20% while decreasing the C/Ti ratio to ~0.5. However, these values are still higher than the TiB values described by Lipatnikov et al and Sundgren et al [46,47]. The decrease in measured hardness of the composite TMC-C could be explained by the generally lower total content of particle reinforcement of only 10 vol.-%.…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 61%