1993
DOI: 10.1016/s1049-250x(08)60091-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Physics and Non-Maxwellian Plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective partial RR cross sections given in equations ( 9) and (10) were calculated in the nonrelativistic dipole, relativistic dipole, and exact relativistic cases. All the radiative transition probabilities needed were determined with the code FAC developed by Gu [26] in both nonrelativistic and relativistic cases.…”
Section: Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective partial RR cross sections given in equations ( 9) and (10) were calculated in the nonrelativistic dipole, relativistic dipole, and exact relativistic cases. All the radiative transition probabilities needed were determined with the code FAC developed by Gu [26] in both nonrelativistic and relativistic cases.…”
Section: Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cross sections may provide sensitive tests for the validity of the approximate methods used in atomic structure and collisional dynamic calculations. They may also be needed in modeling the continuum and line emissions from plasmas with anisotropic electron velocity distributions as well as in spectroscopic diagnostics of such plasmas [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practically all cases these methods assume a Maxwellian electron distribution function. However, it has been shown that even rather small fractions of hot electrons (only some per cent) may alter the diagnostic properties drastically (Gabriel and Phillips 1979, Hammel and Jones 1984, Bartiromo et al 1985, Inal and Dubau 1989, Gabriel et al 1991, Lamoureux 1993, 1997, 1995, Rosmej 1994, 1996, Matte et al 1994, Rosmej and Vikhrev 1997. The neglection of hot electrons results, in almost all cases, in a considerable overestimation of the electron temperature (due to the enhanced collisional excitation of resonance lines) and in an overestimation of the electron density (due to the decreasing exchange cross section with high impact energies).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general, most plasmas exist in a state quite far from thermal equilibrium. For example, in laboratory plasmas, the coupling of the injected external energy with the target system most often generates superthermal electrons escaping from the Maxwellian distribution [9,10]. Non-Maxwellian plasmas [11][12][13] are usually generated when electrons are injected from outside the plasma and whenever they are produced by strong external interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%