Bacterial L-asparaginases play an important role in the treatment of certain types of blood cancers. We are exploring the guinea pig L-asparaginase (gpASNase1) as a potential replacement of the immunogenic bacterial enzymes. The exact mechanism used by L-asparaginases to catalyze the hydrolysis of asparagine into aspartic acid and ammonia has been recently put into question. Earlier experimental data suggested that the reaction proceeds via a covalent intermediate using a ping-pong mechanism, whereas recent computational work advocates the direct displacement of the amine by an activated water. To shed light on this controversy, we generated gpASNase1 mutants of conserved active site residues (T19A, T116A, T19A/T116A, K188M, and Y308F) suspected to play a role in hydrolysis. Using x-ray crystallography, we determined the crystal structures of the T19A, T116A, and K188M mutants soaked in asparagine. We also characterized their steady-state kinetic properties and analyzed the conversion of asparagine to aspartate using NMR. Our structures reveal bound asparagine in the active site that has unambiguously not formed a covalent intermediate. Kinetic and NMR assays detect significant residual activity for all of the mutants. Furthermore, no burst of ammonia production was observed that would indicate covalent intermediate formation and the presence of a ping-pong mechanism. Hence, despite using a variety of techniques, we were unable to obtain experimental evidence that would support the formation of a covalent intermediate. Consequently, our observations support a direct displacement rather than a ping-pong mechanism for L-asparaginases.Currently, there still exists a gap in knowledge regarding the enzymatic mechanism by which L-asparaginases hydrolyze the amino acid L-asparagine to L-aspartic acid and ammonia (Fig. 1A). L-Asparaginases have garnered special attention because of their clinical use in the treatment of certain blood cancers (1). In addition, L-asparaginases are also used commercially by the food industry for reducing the production of acrylamide (2), a compound being investigated for its toxicity and carcinogenicity in humans. Hence, understanding the enzymatic mechanism of these important enzymes can be used to inform the design of variants with improved properties. Our specific interest is with the guinea pig L-asparaginase type I enzyme, which holds potential as a replacement for the currently clinically used bacterial enzymes (see more below).L-Asparaginases can be divided, based on sequence and structural homology, into two unrelated families: type I and II L-asparaginases belong to one family, and type III enzymes belong to another (3). The type I and II enzymes are very similar in terms of overall structure and conservation of active site residues (3). In Escherichia coli, the type I enzyme is cytoplasmic, and type II is periplasmic (3). In addition to having different cellular localization, bacterial type II enzymes have a much lower K m value for Asn (low micromolar versus millimolar). This ϳ...