2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2734564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Transition Probabilities of Aluminum. A Critical Compilation

Abstract: This compilation is the second in a series of updates to Atomic Transition Probabilities, Sodium through Calcium, published in 1969 by Wiese et al. [Atomic Transition Probabilities, Vol. II, Vol. II: Sodium through Calcium, NSROS-NBS Vol. 2 (U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C., 1969)]. Atomic transition probabilities have been critically evaluated and compiled for about 5000 spectral lines of aluminum (nuclear charge Z=13). The cited values and their estimated uncertainties are based on our consideration of all availab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Al  transition probabilities have been discussed by Kelleher & Podobedova (2008b). The data for our adopted lines come from theoretical calculations by the OP (Mendoza et al 1995), under the assumption of LS-coupling.…”
Section: Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al  transition probabilities have been discussed by Kelleher & Podobedova (2008b). The data for our adopted lines come from theoretical calculations by the OP (Mendoza et al 1995), under the assumption of LS-coupling.…”
Section: Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron collisional rates come from open-ADAS 1 (computed as described by Badnell 2011) when possible, including forbidden transitions, and are otherwise computed using Seaton (1962) for allowed transitions. Energy levels and f -values are taken from NIST (Kelleher & Podobedova 2008) when possible, or otherwise the most recent data from Kurucz (Kurucz & Bell 1995). Photoionization cross-sections are again taken from Allende Prieto et al (2003), based on data from TOPbase (Mendoza et al 1995).…”
Section: Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(continued on next page) λ(nm) [1] This work Other authors 2p 5 3p 1 D 2 170.3108 0.15 0.17 [4] 0.17 [5] 0.20 [6] 1.13 2p 5 3p 1 P 1 173.0778 1.54 1.44 [4] 1.44 [5] 1.44 [6] 0.94 2p 5 3p 3 P 2 174.5009 0.045 0.053 [4] 0.054 [5] 0.061 [6] 1.18 2p 5 3p 3 P 0 175.7888 1.57 2.09 [4] 2.10 [5] 1.99 [6] 1.33 2p 5 3p 3 P 1 176.3805 3.33 3.17 [4] 3.17 [5] 3.11 [6] 0.95 2p 5 3p 1 S 0 249.0534 1.96 1.81 [2] 1.61 [4] 1.50 [6] 0.82 [1] NIST [41] observed; [2] Hibbert et al [23]; [4] Froese Fischer & Tachiev [29]; [5] Kelleher & Podobedova [30]; [6] Jönsson et al [31]. a Theoretical wavelengths obtained from energy levels of Martin & Zalubas [16].…”
Section: Fourth Columnmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Afterwards, Hibbert et al [23], Hibbert et al [24], Verner et al [25], Das [26], Verner et al [27], Savukov [28], Froese Fischer and Tachiev [29] calculated oscillator strengths or transition probabilities of some lines of Mg III. Also Kelleher and Podobedova [30] presented a work compiling the different values. Very recently, Jönsson et al [31], published new relativistic calculations including core-core correlations and core-valence effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%