2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2018.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomically smooth interfaces of type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice on metamorphic GaSb buffer grown in 2D mode on GaAs substrate using MBE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The summary of the three groups of material systems that were investigated is given in Table 1. The parameters used during the growth of homoepitaxial, metamorphic, and IMF GaSb materials as well as superlattices (SL) were described in Reference [7]. The growth conditions for AlSb and Al 0.5 Ga 0.5 As 0.05 Sb 0.95 materials are given in Reference [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The summary of the three groups of material systems that were investigated is given in Table 1. The parameters used during the growth of homoepitaxial, metamorphic, and IMF GaSb materials as well as superlattices (SL) were described in Reference [7]. The growth conditions for AlSb and Al 0.5 Ga 0.5 As 0.05 Sb 0.95 materials are given in Reference [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial misfit (IMF) array is most frequently used for reducing the dislocation density in epitaxially grown materials [5,6]. This technique allows for relieving the strain energy by generation of 90 • periodic misfit dislocations at the GaSb/GaAs interface, thus decreasing the threading dislocation density (TDD) [7]. According to Huang et al, the dislocation density (DD) can be reduced by up to four orders of magnitude to about 7 × 10 5 cm −2 using IMF [5,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the beginning of the experiment, reference samples were prepared. Firstly, IMF-GaSb layers on GaAs substrates were grown under optimal (type I, #629) and non-optimal (type I, #554) IMF conditions to highlight the best result [8,24]. Secondly, AlSb growth conditions (type II, #642) and the application of the AlSb material as a buffer layer (type III, #643) were also verified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two most commonly used approaches to reduce the dislocation density; namely, growth of the metamorphic material [5] and interfacial misfit dislocation (IMF) arrays [6]. The first one requires deposition of thick layer [7,8], whereas the second one offers almost full strain relaxation within few monolayers of the material [9]. The lowest threading dislocation density (TDD) of 5 × 10 5 cm −2 (7 × 10 5 cm −2 ), estimated from the plan-view TEM images (based on the etching and counting of the pits on the surface), was obtained for the GaSb/GaAs system by Huang et al [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strain in the SL can be successfully controlled by the type and the thickness of the interfaces [ 16 , 17 ]. Even for superlattices grown on GaAs substrate, (lattice mismatch between GaSb and GaAs is 7.8%) the dislocation density may be significantly reduced by using either the interfacial misfit array technique [ 14 , 18 ] or metamorphic buffer [ 19 ]. Nowadays, the InAs/GaSb superlattices are used more and more in the fabrication of focal plane arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%