2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic and Thermodynamic Analysis of N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) Recognition by the Reader Domain of YTHDC1

Abstract: N6-Methyladenosine (m 6 A) is the most frequent modification in eukaryotic messenger RNA (mRNA) and its cellular processing and functions are regulated by the reader proteins YTHDCs and YTHDFs. However, the mechanism of m 6 A recognition by the reader proteins is still elusive. Here, we investigate this recognition process by combining atomistic simulations, sitedirected mutagenesis, and biophysical experiments using YTHDC1 as a model. We find that the N6 methyl group of m 6 A contributes to the binding throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected the binding enthalpy with the hairpin RNA is slightly reduced compared to the single-stranded m 6 A RNA due to the local unfolding of the closing base pair. Interestingly, recognition of m 6 A in the context of both the single-stranded or the hairpin RNA ligand by the YTH domain shows slightly unfavorable binding entropy (consistent with previous reports), although the release of solvent molecules from the pocket of the protein that accommodates the N 6 methyl is expected to show favorable entropic contributions for binding ( 60 , 61 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As expected the binding enthalpy with the hairpin RNA is slightly reduced compared to the single-stranded m 6 A RNA due to the local unfolding of the closing base pair. Interestingly, recognition of m 6 A in the context of both the single-stranded or the hairpin RNA ligand by the YTH domain shows slightly unfavorable binding entropy (consistent with previous reports), although the release of solvent molecules from the pocket of the protein that accommodates the N 6 methyl is expected to show favorable entropic contributions for binding ( 60 , 61 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Methylamine indicates that twenty methylamines were added into the simulation water box before start. b NOEfix function was applied to all (312) or selected (18) experimental NOE distances showing ensemble-averaged distance violations in the 2mtv_m 6 A 3 simulations. c Modified vdW parameters of the phosphates 35 with associated modified RNA backbone dihedral parameters 36 and OPC water model 34 were used.…”
Section: Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent computational study of this system (using a different force field) utilized thermodynamic integration (TI) and indicated 1.7 kcal/mol penalty for binding of the unmethylated substrate. 18 However, the calculations were performed for a model system with an isolated m 6 A nucleoside rather than a full oligonucleotide and the solute atoms were immobilized by positional restraints. 18 Furthermore, our MD simulations indicated that a single water molecule often invades the binding pocket in presence of standard adenosine (see above and Figure 3) which somewhat complicates the sampling of m 6 A 3 A 3 TI calculations; see Supporting Information for further details.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Integration Reproduces Lower Binding Affinity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, m 6 A modifications can be removed by a-ketoglutarate-dependent and Fe(II)-dependent demethylases, specifically fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) (20) and alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) (21). Additionally, the functions of m 6 A modifications on RNA metabolism depend on specific recognition by m 6 A binding proteins (YTHDF1/2/3, YTHDC1/2, IGF2BP1/2/3, and hnRNPC) (22)(23)(24). A rapidly accumulating wealth of studies are delineating the aberrant m 6 A abundance driven by the dysregulation of m 6 A modification enzymes in diverse cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%