2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic simulation of crystallization of a polyethylene melt in steady uniaxial extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,22,23 The slope of the plot of ⌬U ͑tor+nb͒ versus ⌬T conf,͑tor+nb͒ using the data near equilibrium is calculated as 2.75Ϯ 0.99 J / ͑g K͒, which is also consistent with the NEMD result ͓2.5Ϯ 1.1 J / ͑g K͒ for PCF and 2.7Ϯ 1.3 J / ͑g K͒ for PEF͔ and the experimental value 42 of 2.67 J/͑g K͒. It has been further demonstrated in a recent NEMC simulation study 43,44 of the flow-induced polymer crystallization under strong flow fields that the application of ⌬T conf,͑tor+nb͒ correctly discerns the flow-induced crystalline phase from the simple oriented melt and even quantitatively predicts remarkably well the flow-enhanced melting-point elevation that has been reported in experiment. Furthermore, inclusion of data at higher flow strengths might enable calculation of a nonequilibrium heat capacity.…”
Section: Nemc Simulations Of Polymeric Fluidssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18,22,23 The slope of the plot of ⌬U ͑tor+nb͒ versus ⌬T conf,͑tor+nb͒ using the data near equilibrium is calculated as 2.75Ϯ 0.99 J / ͑g K͒, which is also consistent with the NEMD result ͓2.5Ϯ 1.1 J / ͑g K͒ for PCF and 2.7Ϯ 1.3 J / ͑g K͒ for PEF͔ and the experimental value 42 of 2.67 J/͑g K͒. It has been further demonstrated in a recent NEMC simulation study 43,44 of the flow-induced polymer crystallization under strong flow fields that the application of ⌬T conf,͑tor+nb͒ correctly discerns the flow-induced crystalline phase from the simple oriented melt and even quantitatively predicts remarkably well the flow-enhanced melting-point elevation that has been reported in experiment. Furthermore, inclusion of data at higher flow strengths might enable calculation of a nonequilibrium heat capacity.…”
Section: Nemc Simulations Of Polymeric Fluidssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Further evidence arises from the fact that ⌬T conf,͑tor+nb͒ predicts remarkably well the experimental heat capacity of amorphous polyethylene melts 42 and the melting-point elevation under flow. 43,44 The general features revealed from the present work are expected to be valid for other polymeric systems as well, although the specific quantitative aspects may be different for various materials as they are characterized by different potentials and force fields. We anticipate that the present study would be useful in the application of the configurational temperature for interpreting many other physical phenomena ͑e.g., phase separation or transitions in polymeric systems͒ as well as flowing polymeric materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the majority of this work involves realistic atomistic and united-atoms models of PE [33,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], which are known to be quite accurate for both the liquid and solid phases due to the simplicity of the interatomic forces. Notable of the NEMD and NEMC studies of FIC are those of Baig and Edwards [40,41,47] and Rutledge and co-workers [36,39,[44][45][46]. These works illustrated important crystal properties and nucleation mechanisms of PE morphologies under shear and extensional flows; however, all of these simulations of FIC were performed on relatively low molar mass PEs with few entanglements under quiescent conditions, and each ranged from 15%-35% undercooling; i.e., below the crystalline melting point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, virtual experimentation can be conducted on pure systems (e.g., strictly monodisperse, linear macromolecular melts) under ideal conditions without regard to instrument compliance or inertia. NEMD simulations also provide rheological, optical, and spectroscopic data in physical units that can be directly compared with experimental data [34][35][36][37][38] , in contrast to simulations of coarse-grained models (as discussed below). The primary limitations on what can be achieved are (1) the accuracy of the atomic potential model of the polymeric liquid and (2) the vast computational resources necessary to simulate these highly entangled macromolecular systems possessing up to 10 8 degrees of freedom which must be tracked over multiple disengagement times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%