2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-020-02715-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic simulation of tensile strength properties of graphene with complex vacancy and topological defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SW1 configuration was mechanically stronger compared to all other defects. Here, it is interesting to note that the same behaviour was observed for the zigzag graphene with the SW1 defect [50]. Compared to a pristine CGNR, the strength was reduced from 90.6 to 75.7 GPa and the failure strain from 0.23 to 0.15 for a SW1 defect, whereas for a 5-8-5 defect the strength reduced to 61.8 GPa and the strain to 0.12.…”
Section: Topological and Vacancy Defects In Cgnrsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The SW1 configuration was mechanically stronger compared to all other defects. Here, it is interesting to note that the same behaviour was observed for the zigzag graphene with the SW1 defect [50]. Compared to a pristine CGNR, the strength was reduced from 90.6 to 75.7 GPa and the failure strain from 0.23 to 0.15 for a SW1 defect, whereas for a 5-8-5 defect the strength reduced to 61.8 GPa and the strain to 0.12.…”
Section: Topological and Vacancy Defects In Cgnrsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The exfoliation is effective to expose the topological defects and also the N dopants buried in carbon base. Meanwhile ε ∥ induces in‐plane broken in S‐1‐900, creating vacancies and topological defects at carbon edges, [ 25 ] as confirmed by ACTEM. The mechanism of catalytic sites formation is illustrated in Figure 2b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This change is associated with a thermal exfoliation from molten halogen salt accompanied with intercalation of the carbon layers to expand the interlayer spacing, as shown in Figure 1c, the randomly selected interplanar spaces of the graphite phase (002) in average are 0.39, 0.38, or 0.35 nm, which are larger than that of 0.34 nm for graphite. [ 26 ] Meanwhile, the intercalation also creates abundant topological defects [ 25 ] in S‐1‐900, as confirmed by the aberration‐corrected transmission electron microscopy (ACTEM) images (Figure 1d and Figure S3, Supporting Information). The areas 1 and 2 with red dash squares in Figure 1d are enlarged as shown in Figure 1e and filtered image in Figure S4 (Supporting Information), which clearly reveals the formation of five‐sided regular pentagons (red lines) with hexagons around (yellow lines) at the armchair edges of graphene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation