2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic simulations of vibration and damping in three-dimensional graphene honeycomb nanomechanical resonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stiffness was calculated in this work by DFT. The damping factor of the nanostructures was assumed to be 3 × 10 –2 based on a previous work . The graph in Figure a shows how the maximum PNR deflection depends on the frequency and amplitude of the excitation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness was calculated in this work by DFT. The damping factor of the nanostructures was assumed to be 3 × 10 –2 based on a previous work . The graph in Figure a shows how the maximum PNR deflection depends on the frequency and amplitude of the excitation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the temperature is considered to be zero degrees Kelvin and also the chemical doping and gate voltage are considered to be ineffective, as a result of these cases, both the carrier density (ns) and the chemical potential (µc) are negligible and approximately zero. 𝜎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 and 𝜎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 are described such this [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]…”
Section: Graphene Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the slight uncertainty of the AIREBO application for the study of mechanical properties of GA, there is plenty of work devoted to this issue, where simulation is conducted with AIREBO. Based on such works as [37][38][39]63,64], where the deformation behavior of GA was studied and considered in comparison with the experiment, we choose AIREBO interatomic potential for the present work. To avoid non-physical post-hardening behavior under large strains, we set the cut-off distances in the AIREBO potential to 1.92 Å, as suggested by previous studies [37,65,66].…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the honeycomb GA can be effectively used for the verification of the model accuracy. Interestingly, it was shown in [64] that the resonant frequency of the zigzag honeycomb is lower than that of the armchair honeycomb, which means that the nonlinearity of the zigzag honeycomb is stronger than that of the armchair honeycomb. For arrow GA, the stress-strain curves for uniaxial tension along the x and z directions almost coincide.…”
Section: Effect Of Loading Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%