2007
DOI: 10.1021/la063228u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic Simulations to Compute Surface Properties of Poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP) and Blends of PVP/Chitosan

Abstract: Atomistic simulations were performed on poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP) and its blends with chitosan (CS) in different ratios using molecular mechanics (MM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in three-dimensionally periodic and effective two-dimensionally periodic condensed phases. Four independent microstructures were generated to analyze their surface properties. The calculated surface-energy values for PVP compared quite well with the experimental data reported in the literature. The density profile … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polymer assemblies containing three chains of PVP (20 monomer units) in its atatic stereochemical structure and three chains of chitosan (10 monomer units) were generated for the simulation of a 50/50 composition of the blend as previously conducted 14. For the simulation of PVP/chitosan 20/80, 33/67, 67/33, and 80/20 blends, three chains of each polymer were also used, but the numbers of monomer units were 20/40, 20/20, 40/10, and 80/10, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polymer assemblies containing three chains of PVP (20 monomer units) in its atatic stereochemical structure and three chains of chitosan (10 monomer units) were generated for the simulation of a 50/50 composition of the blend as previously conducted 14. For the simulation of PVP/chitosan 20/80, 33/67, 67/33, and 80/20 blends, three chains of each polymer were also used, but the numbers of monomer units were 20/40, 20/20, 40/10, and 80/10, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each generated polymer chain was minimized using the Discover module, and the blend systems were built inside a box with periodic boundary conditions constructed using the amorphous cell module of the Materials Studio. The density of the blend system was estimated from densities of the pure polymers, that is, 1.04 g/cm 3 for PVP and 0.67 g/cm 3 for chitosan 14. Thus, the simulation cell densities for PVP/chitosan 20/80, 33/67, 50/50, 67/33, and 80/20 were 0.744, 0.792, 0.855, 0.917, and 0.966 g/cm 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the effect of initial drug concentration on the loading efficiency of the drug, understanding the interactions between the components of the studied system is essential. Previous simulation studies indicated that condensed-phase optimized molecular potentials for atomistic simulation studies (COMPASS) force field effectively and accurately represents the molecular interactions [31][32][33]. Therefore, in this work the COMPASS force field was used to represent all the interactions between the polymer, as the carrier, and the drug in the studied drug delivery system.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, atomistic simulations of blends are still relatively scarce. So far, most studies have focussed on miscibility aspects [174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184]. Already early on, atomistic and mesoscopic simulations were combined in multiscale studies: Atomistic simulations were used to determine the Flory-Huggins χ -parameter, coarse-grained methods were then applied to study large-scale aspects of phase separation [185][186][187][188][189][190][191] or mesophase formation [192].…”
Section: Atomistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%