2019
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomoxetine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with autism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Atomoxetine is prescribed to children with autism spectrum disorder having symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in this population. After screening for inclusion criteria, we identified three randomized placebo controlled trials involving 241 children. We assessed internal validity using standard Cochrane Risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used Revman 5.3 for meta‐analysis and GRADE approach to create summar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, effects on parent-rated hyperactivity were smaller in the current study compared to the previously published meta-analysis on this topic (Patra et al, 2019). This difference may be due to the inclusion of two additional studies in our meta-analysis of atomoxetine effects on parent-rated hyperactivity in ASD (Harfterkamp et al, 2012(Harfterkamp et al, , 2014McDougle, 2017), whereas our meta-analysis of parent-rated inattention included the same studies submitted to meta-analysis previously (Patra et al, 2019). Based on available evidence, effect sizes for treatment efficacy with atomoxetine were slightly smaller compared to methylphenidate and perhaps less clinically meaningful based on available CGI-I data.…”
Section: Summary Of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, effects on parent-rated hyperactivity were smaller in the current study compared to the previously published meta-analysis on this topic (Patra et al, 2019). This difference may be due to the inclusion of two additional studies in our meta-analysis of atomoxetine effects on parent-rated hyperactivity in ASD (Harfterkamp et al, 2012(Harfterkamp et al, , 2014McDougle, 2017), whereas our meta-analysis of parent-rated inattention included the same studies submitted to meta-analysis previously (Patra et al, 2019). Based on available evidence, effect sizes for treatment efficacy with atomoxetine were slightly smaller compared to methylphenidate and perhaps less clinically meaningful based on available CGI-I data.…”
Section: Summary Of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For anti‐ADHD medications, we included three NMAs 49,144,145 , 11 MAs 146‐156 , 12 RCTs 157‐168 also included in those NMA/MAs, five additional RCTs 169‐173 , and five cohort studies 99,174‐177 . There were 148,664 youth on anti‐ADHD medications, including 28,834 across 298 RCTs after eliminating duplicated RCTs in multiple NMA/MAs (27,188 in NMA/MAs, 1,646 in additional RCTs), and 119,830 in five cohort studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the elevated rates of ADHD symptoms in ASD, questions arise around treatment options in this young population. There have been multiple studies on medication treatment of ADHD for children with ASD, ages 5 years or above [Ghanizadeh, 2013; Goel, Hong, Findling, & Ji, 2018; Handen, Johnson, & Lubetsky, 2000; Harfterkamp et al, 2012; Jaselskis, Cook, & Fletcher, 1992; Mahajan et al, 2012; Ming, Gordon, Kang, & Wagner, 2008; Patra, Nebhinani, Viswanathan, & Kirubakaran, 2019; Pearson et al, 2013; Politte et al, 2018; Scahill et al, 2015; Sturman, Deckx, & Driel, 2017], and these studies have shown a good clinical efficacy of ADHD medications. There is also a stout body of literature examining clinical efficacy of behavior interventions in all ages of children with ASD and disruptive behaviors [Bearss et al, 2015; Brookman‐Frazee, Stahmer, Baker‐Ericzen, & Tsai, 2006; Masse, McNeil, Wagner, & Quetsch, 2016], which is commonly associated with ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%