2007
DOI: 10.1002/9783527616978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
181
0
27

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
181
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…For more in depth descriptions of the concepts and terms used to measure radiation (especially as related to exposure) and the total absorbed dose received by a receptor, see Blaylock and others (1993), Brechignac and Desmet (2005), and Turner (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more in depth descriptions of the concepts and terms used to measure radiation (especially as related to exposure) and the total absorbed dose received by a receptor, see Blaylock and others (1993), Brechignac and Desmet (2005), and Turner (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabulations of chemical exposure concentrations and radiation dose based on available guidance are also included as a linkage to the pathway analysis (tables [6][7][8]. Derivation of radiation dose is detailed in Turner (2007) and Bréchignac and Desmet (2005), and exposure units used to characterize radiation toxicity are detailed in appendix 2.…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convenient scintillator is added to this base and mixed homogeneously. The concentration of this main scintillator is about 1% by weight of the mixture, which is sufficient to produce a high light yield [3]. Most manufacturers offer different Scintillators based on varying concentration of solvents, so that the user can make the selection according to the system requirements.…”
Section: Overview On Scintillation Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Averaging the pulse heights from the separate SiPMs results in a resolution improvement, averaged over all measurements, of 1.43 ± 0.03, 1.42 ± 0.03 and 1.42 ± 0.02 times for the S3035, matched S3035 and MAPD-3n detectors respectively. This indicated that the resolution is primarily due to random noise, where averaging over the two detectors results in a theoretical Assuming that the energy resolution is dominated by Poisson statistics, the mean number of photons detected, n , may be estimated using the measured energy resolution R [18]:…”
Section: Energy Calibration and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%