2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atorvastatin Treatment for Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Enlargement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline PSA level was 0.08 ng/mL lower in the treatment arm than the placebo control arm. After 26 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin, there was a mean decrease of 0.1 ng/mL compared to a mean decrease of 0.0 ng/mL in the placebo control group (59). However, these results were not statistically significant but provide supporting evidence of the role that statins may play in decreasing PSA levels.…”
Section: Impact Of Statin Therapy On Psacontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baseline PSA level was 0.08 ng/mL lower in the treatment arm than the placebo control arm. After 26 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin, there was a mean decrease of 0.1 ng/mL compared to a mean decrease of 0.0 ng/mL in the placebo control group (59). However, these results were not statistically significant but provide supporting evidence of the role that statins may play in decreasing PSA levels.…”
Section: Impact Of Statin Therapy On Psacontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In 2007, Mills et al published a phase 2, double-blind, randomized placebo controlled clinical trial evaluating atorvastatin treatment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement (59). Included among many of the endpoints were differences in PSA levels among subjects after 6 months of treatment with 80 mg daily of atorvastatin or placebo.…”
Section: Impact Of Statin Therapy On Psamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, short-term lovastatin treatment does not seem to have any effect on IPSS, PV or PSA levels in men with prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH and lipidemia [22]. Moreover, a large, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study found that atorvastatin had no effects on IPSS or PV over 6 months in 350 patients with presumed BPH who had serum LDLs in the range of 100-190 mg/dl [23]. However, in the present study, we observed positive results and found that both simvastatin and atorvastatin significantly reduced the serum levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C and increased the serum levels of HDL-C; these findings are consistent with those previously described [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast Mills et al, assessed the efficacy of atrovastatin in the treatment of LUTS and prostate enlargement in a large, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. The results of these previous studies are controversial; while treatment with simvastatin achieved a 38-40% clinical response in the first study (24), treatment with atrovastatin did not show an effect on urinary symptoms, flow rate, quality of life, or prostate size and morphology and PSA in the second (25). Given the similarities in the pharmacological profile between simvastatin and atrovastatin it could be easily assumed that the effects on observed in the study of Marino et al, are more likely to be attributed to the mepartricin whose efficacy in the treating of BPH related symptoms was further investigated (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Only two clinical trials (24,25) to date have addressed the potential use of statins in the treatment of men with LUTS and BPH. In the study of Marino et al, simvastatin was used along with mepartricin, a polyene macrolide antibiotic with unknown composition, for the treatment of symptomatic BPH in a small sample of patients.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%