2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913001107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATP-independent CFTR channel gating and allosteric modulation by phosphorylation

Abstract: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel, an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter. CFTR gating is linked to ATP binding and dimerization of its two nucleotide binding domains (NBDs). Channel activation also requires phosphorylation of the R domain by poorly understood mechanisms. Unlike conventional ligand-gated channels, CFTR is an ATPase for which ligand (ATP) release typically involves nucleotide hydrolysis. The extent to which C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

30
165
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
30
165
2
Order By: Relevance
“…GOF mutations for conventional ligand-gated channels typically locate along the axis that links the ligand-binding site to the pore. The GOF mutations/modifications that have been discovered for CFTR locate near the NBD dimer interface (Szollosi et al 2010), along the cytosolic loops that connect the NBDs to the TMDs (Wang et al 2010) and within a TM that has been argued to line the pore (Bai et al 2010). Thus, the CFTR gating mechanism appears to share features with the gating of conventional ligand-gated channels; notably, unliganded openings and GOF mutations along the axis that links the ligand-binding domains to the pore.…”
Section: Future Perspectives Regarding Atp-dependent Channel Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GOF mutations for conventional ligand-gated channels typically locate along the axis that links the ligand-binding site to the pore. The GOF mutations/modifications that have been discovered for CFTR locate near the NBD dimer interface (Szollosi et al 2010), along the cytosolic loops that connect the NBDs to the TMDs (Wang et al 2010) and within a TM that has been argued to line the pore (Bai et al 2010). Thus, the CFTR gating mechanism appears to share features with the gating of conventional ligand-gated channels; notably, unliganded openings and GOF mutations along the axis that links the ligand-binding domains to the pore.…”
Section: Future Perspectives Regarding Atp-dependent Channel Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ATP-independent gating is readily seen with mutants with dysfunctional site 2 (e.g., the G551D mutation) (Bompadre et al 2007), or interestingly constructs that lack the entire NBD2 (Cui et al 2007;Wang et al 2007). Furthermore, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations that enhance ATP-free CFTR gating and increase the otherwise low activities of constructs that are insensitive to ATP (G551D and NBD-deletion mutants) have been produced (Szollosi et al 2010;Wang et al 2010). ATP-independent gating also can be strongly enhanced by chemically modifying cysteines placed at specific locations in TM 6 (Bai et al 2010).…”
Section: Future Perspectives Regarding Atp-dependent Channel Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Site 1 is catalytically inactive but binds ATP tightly; thus, most cycles of channel opening and closing are temporally linked to ATP binding and subsequent hydrolysis at site 2 (6 -9). R domain phosphorylation controls channel gating by unknown mechanisms that may include regulating both NBD dimerization (10) and the conformations or flexibilities of the TMs (11,12).…”
Section: The Cftr Channel Is An Essential Mediator Of Electrolyte Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore formed by TMD1 and TMD2 is gated by binding/hydrolysis of ATP at the interface of NBD1 and NBD2 and regulated by R domain phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (11,12). Although CLs have been found to play a central role in channel gating (6,7,9,10,13,14), it is largely unknown how CLs couple ATP actions at NBDs to gating rearrangements of TMDs and how R domain phosphorylation by cAMP-dependent PKA mediates the coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%