2008
DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.110775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial Fibrillation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Abstract: Abstract-We performed a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program database to assess the incidence of atrial fibrillation in the elderly hypertensive population, its influence on cardiovascular events, and whether antihypertensive treatment can prevent its onset. The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 4736 subjects with isolated systolic hypertension aged Ն60 years. Atrial fibrillation was an exclusion criterion from the trial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two trials had 3 treatment arms, resulting in 13 comparisons between groups reporting both VR and OR for new-onset AF. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There was significant heterogeneity between trials in effects of treatment on VR (PϽ0.0001; Figure 1) and in effects on new-onset AF (Pϭ0.0017). However, lower VR was unrelated to new-onset AF either on meta-analysis (group with lower versus higher SD SBP: ORϭ1.02; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.15; 125 878 patients; 13 comparisons; Figure 1) or on metaregression (log OR versus log VR SBP r 2 ϭ0.109, Pϭ0.270; Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two trials had 3 treatment arms, resulting in 13 comparisons between groups reporting both VR and OR for new-onset AF. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There was significant heterogeneity between trials in effects of treatment on VR (PϽ0.0001; Figure 1) and in effects on new-onset AF (Pϭ0.0017). However, lower VR was unrelated to new-onset AF either on meta-analysis (group with lower versus higher SD SBP: ORϭ1.02; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.15; 125 878 patients; 13 comparisons; Figure 1) or on metaregression (log OR versus log VR SBP r 2 ϭ0.109, Pϭ0.270; Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New-onset AF was significantly reduced by randomization to an angiotensin receptor blocker in 2 trials (versus a ␤-blocker/calcium channel blocker) 6,7 with a trend in a pooled analysis of all angiotensin receptor blockers versus other drug comparisons (ORϭ0.85; 0.71 to 1.01; Pϭ0.067; 4 trials; 47 482 patients), but there were no parallel effects of angiotensin receptor blockers on VR SBP or diastolic BP. There were no other drug class effects in any individual trial or in pooled analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a high proportion of men had systolic blood pressure Ն140 mm Hg (63.6%) and the majority would be classified as having hypertension on the basis of systolic blood pressure Ն140 mm Hg, we used the higher threshold of systolic blood pressure of Ն160 mm Hg, as used in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. 27 Hypertension in this older cohort was defined as systolic blood pressure Ն160 or diastolic blood pressure Ն90 or using antihypertensive treatment.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 --7 On the other hand, hypertension is one of the important risk factors for the occurrence of AF, 8 and increased the risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality in patients with AF. 9,10 Compare with other risk factors for AF, hypertension appears to be responsible for more AF than any other risk factor because of its high prevalence. However, the pathophysiological link between AF and hypertension remains unclear.…”
Section: Hypertension Is the Most Common Coexisting Cardiovascular DImentioning
confidence: 99%