2015
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2014.0102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial fibrillation in cardiac resynchronization recipients with and without prior arrhythmic history. How much of arrhythmia is too much?

Abstract: Background:The aim of the study was to assess long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (Cardiol J 2015; 22, 3: 267-275)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Additionally, it has been shown that the arrhythmia burden influence outcomes in HFrEF patients. 18 Although a retrospective analysis, our findings on CB2-based PVI in HFrEF patients are in line with previous results and we found an improved NYHA class and increased LVEF during follow-up. 19 The reported rates for improved LVEF range between 4% and 22%.…”
Section: Acute Ablation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5 Additionally, it has been shown that the arrhythmia burden influence outcomes in HFrEF patients. 18 Although a retrospective analysis, our findings on CB2-based PVI in HFrEF patients are in line with previous results and we found an improved NYHA class and increased LVEF during follow-up. 19 The reported rates for improved LVEF range between 4% and 22%.…”
Section: Acute Ablation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, even transient reduction in arrhythmia burden may translate into symptomatic and echocardiographic benefit, especially in HF patients. It was shown previously that arrhythmia burden influenced outcomes in HF patients [10]. What is more, only four patients in our group underwent a second procedure, which translates into 1.13 procedures/patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Prior to this study, several have studied device-detected data to assess the incidence and/or the clinical importance of AF in CRT-patients [7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, the monitoring periods, as well as the definitions of AF have varied, why it is difficult to make comparisons and conclusions.…”
Section: Incidence Of Af During the First Year After Crt-implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Lenarcyk et al recently studied device-collected data on AF episodes during 24 months and found that for each additional per-cent of time spent in AF mortality increased by 5 %. Even though Lenarcyk et.…”
Section: The Prognostic Aspect Of the Device-detected Burden Of Ahrementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation