2021
DOI: 10.3390/bios11080269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial Fibrillation Prediction from Critically Ill Sepsis Patients

Abstract: Sepsis is defined by life-threatening organ dysfunction during infection and is the leading cause of death in hospitals. During sepsis, there is a high risk that new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) can occur, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, early prediction of AF during sepsis would allow testing of interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent AF and its severe complications. In this paper, we present a novel automated AF prediction algorithm for criti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date the availability of sophisticated risk prediction models in critical care is limited. The few existing models focus on septic patients only (16) and do not include the large proportion of critically ill patients with non-infectious pathologies. Advanced models for prediction of AF during critical illness, but before its clinical onset, would allow early interventions with a view to preventing serious AF-associated complications, such as haemodynamic instability, stroke and thromboembolic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date the availability of sophisticated risk prediction models in critical care is limited. The few existing models focus on septic patients only (16) and do not include the large proportion of critically ill patients with non-infectious pathologies. Advanced models for prediction of AF during critical illness, but before its clinical onset, would allow early interventions with a view to preventing serious AF-associated complications, such as haemodynamic instability, stroke and thromboembolic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would aid in quantifying the burden of NOAF that is clinically important and contribute to a uniform definition of NOAF to be used in future studies. Continuous monitoring with computational classification may enable prediction of the development of atrial fibrillation [31] and enable the stratification of patients with varied duration of NOAF, potentially allowing predictive enrichment in clinical trials. Clinically, enhanced detection of these arrhythmias has the potential to markedly enhance our understanding of the true burden of disease and management of this arrhythmia in critically ill patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of two studies focused in critically ill patients ( 30 , 31 ), machine learning-based predictions of incident AF have been restricted to community practice settings using administrative health record data ( 32 , 33 ). Despite the limited translation of these models to cardiovascular disease referral populations, these studies provided foundational evidence for machine learning to provide incremental value for the prediction of incident AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%