2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2011.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrioventricular Conduction Disturbances After CoreValve® Aortic Prosthesis Implantation. Predictive Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the procedural –modifiable- risk factors and depth of implantation, one study (n = 65; CoreValve only) reported a frame depth in the LVOT of 11.1 mm as an independent predictor of PPI with 81% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity [ 22 ]. Similarly, another study revealed that if the proximal end of the valve frame was positioned <6.7 mm from the lower edge of the noncoronary cusp, no prosthesis-related left bundle branch block would occur [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the procedural –modifiable- risk factors and depth of implantation, one study (n = 65; CoreValve only) reported a frame depth in the LVOT of 11.1 mm as an independent predictor of PPI with 81% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity [ 22 ]. Similarly, another study revealed that if the proximal end of the valve frame was positioned <6.7 mm from the lower edge of the noncoronary cusp, no prosthesis-related left bundle branch block would occur [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%