2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7404-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up: An Intervention for Parents at Risk of Maltreating Their Infants and Toddlers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
57
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of attachment-based interventions designed for children exposed to adversity have demonstrated promising effects on neurobiological outcomes. For example, both Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (Fisher & Chamberlain, 2000) and the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (Dozier, Meade, & Bernard, 2014) have integrated hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation into their theories of therapeutic change, and have specifically targeted cortisol as a marker of treatment efficacy. Given that cortisol is understood to play a major part in cellular aging (Epel et al, 2006;Kroenke et al, 2011;Shalev, Entringer, et al, 2013), attachment-based intervention studies might also examine changes in telomere length as a potential outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of attachment-based interventions designed for children exposed to adversity have demonstrated promising effects on neurobiological outcomes. For example, both Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (Fisher & Chamberlain, 2000) and the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (Dozier, Meade, & Bernard, 2014) have integrated hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation into their theories of therapeutic change, and have specifically targeted cortisol as a marker of treatment efficacy. Given that cortisol is understood to play a major part in cellular aging (Epel et al, 2006;Kroenke et al, 2011;Shalev, Entringer, et al, 2013), attachment-based intervention studies might also examine changes in telomere length as a potential outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three targets were intended to enhance children’s ability to develop secure and organized attachments, to develop normative cortisol production, and to develop the ability to regulate emotions effectively (Dozier, Bernard, & Meade, in press)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, such programs have not typically demonstrated long‐term improvements in child development or the quality of the mother–child relationship, suggesting the importance of implementing an alternative treatment approach with this population (Suchman, Pajulo, DeCoste, & Mayes, ). Instead, parenting interventions that focus on the emotional quality of the parent–child relationship itself rather than on teaching specific parenting behaviors (e.g., limit‐setting, problem‐solving, communication, and coping skills) have shown promise in improving attachment security, mother–child interactional quality, and child development in general high‐risk populations (e.g., “Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch‐up”; Dozier, Meade, & Bernard, ; “Circle of Security”; Powell, Cooper, Hoffman, & Marvin, ). Given substance‐using mothers’ unique behavioral presentation (Eiden, Stevens, Schuetze, & Dombkowski, ; Molitor, Mayes, & Ward, ), neural profiles (Kim et al., ; Landi et al., ), and typically high trauma load (Covington, ; Gil‐Rivas, Fiorentine, & Anglin, ; Marcenko, Kemp, & Larson, ), researchers and clinicians alike have noted the need for specialized parenting interventions designed with this population in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%