2011
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment security representations in institutionalized children and children living with their families: links to problem behaviour

Abstract: The present work analyses differences in the attachment representations of institutionalized children as compared with children from low and high educational level living with their natural families. Participants were 91 Portuguese children, 52% girls, aged 48-96 months. There were three different groups: 19 institutionalized children, 16 low educational level families' children and 56 from high educational level families'. Attachment representations were assessed for Security of the narratives of the Attachme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To develop an attachment relationship is a right for all human infants, but in institutional contexts this a difficult task because the high child: caregiver ratio impacts on the opportunity for establishing a stable and continuing attachment bond with a caregiver. Among the variables contributing to the adjustment of institutionalised children, attachment is a fundamental one, given its relevance for the quality of subsequent social‐emotional development: different attachment patterns are involved in actualising developmental potential both in family‐reared (FR) and previously institutionalised children (Cassidy and Shaver, ; Lionetti, ; Torres et al ., ). So far, a few but noteworthy studies have investigated attachment distribution towards the favourite caregiver in institutionalised children, reporting higher rates of insecure, disorganised and cannot classify attachment patterns (Vorria et al ., ; Zeanah et al ., ).…”
Section: Attachment Impairments In Institutionalised Childrenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To develop an attachment relationship is a right for all human infants, but in institutional contexts this a difficult task because the high child: caregiver ratio impacts on the opportunity for establishing a stable and continuing attachment bond with a caregiver. Among the variables contributing to the adjustment of institutionalised children, attachment is a fundamental one, given its relevance for the quality of subsequent social‐emotional development: different attachment patterns are involved in actualising developmental potential both in family‐reared (FR) and previously institutionalised children (Cassidy and Shaver, ; Lionetti, ; Torres et al ., ). So far, a few but noteworthy studies have investigated attachment distribution towards the favourite caregiver in institutionalised children, reporting higher rates of insecure, disorganised and cannot classify attachment patterns (Vorria et al ., ; Zeanah et al ., ).…”
Section: Attachment Impairments In Institutionalised Childrenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 1). In sum, to the studies included in Bakermans-Kranenburg et al's review (2011) on attachment in children in institutions, we added the studies of Katsurada (2007), Torres and colleagues (Torres et al, 2012), and Barone and colleagues ; all investigated attachment using a representational assessment method. Adding these articles allowed us to include the type of assessment procedure as a moderator in the data analysis.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that not all studies differentiate between insecure attachment subcategories (see Torres et al, 2012), the insecureambivalent (C) and insecure-avoidant (A) patterns were collapsed into a more general insecure category (A/C). Similarly, as both the disorganized and thecannot/classify pattern are considered at risk for the quality of subsequent development and have potentially common developmental pathways, following the convention in the field (Zeanah et al, 2005), the two categories were collapsed into a single disorganized pattern (D/CC).…”
Section: Effect Size Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benavente, Justo, & Veríssimo, 2009;Carvalho et al, 2010;Custódio & Cruz, 2008;Maia, Ferreira, Veríssimo, Santos, & Shin, 2008;Silva et al, 2008;Torres, Maia, Veríssimo, Fernandes, & Silva, 2011), o presente estudo teve como principal objectivo averiguar a existência de diferenças significativas de género na performance de uma amostra normativa de crianças em idade pré-escolar.…”
Section: Attachment Story Completation Taskunclassified