2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/compsac48688.2020.00-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attack Intention Estimation Based on Syntax Analysis and Dynamic Analysis for SQL Injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the lack of class-imbalance solutions in major machine learning-driven methods like [35] results in reduced and nongeneralizable outcomes [36]. Author [37] applied syntax-structure learning concept towards injection detection; however, lower computational efficiency (accuracy 83.1%) confines it is more limited for NoSQL databases. Noticeably, these approaches cannot be suitable for NoSQL databases due to dynamic data in nature and different data structures [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the lack of class-imbalance solutions in major machine learning-driven methods like [35] results in reduced and nongeneralizable outcomes [36]. Author [37] applied syntax-structure learning concept towards injection detection; however, lower computational efficiency (accuracy 83.1%) confines it is more limited for NoSQL databases. Noticeably, these approaches cannot be suitable for NoSQL databases due to dynamic data in nature and different data structures [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common technique is predicate pushdown, which involves moving filter conditions closer to the data retrieval operations. This reduces the size of intermediate results and minimizes the amount of data processed in subsequent stages (Kuroki et al, 2020). Another method is join reordering, which rearranges the order of join operations to exploit indexes and reduce the number of tuples processed.…”
Section: Query Rewriting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common technique is predicate pushdown, which involves moving filter conditions closer to the data retrieval operations. This reduces the size of intermediate results and minimizes the amount of data processed in subsequent stages (Kuroki et al, 2020). Another method is join reordering, which rearranges the order of join operations to exploit indexes and reduce the number of tuples processed.…”
Section: Query Rewriting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%