1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention and expectation problems in bicycle–car collisions: an in-depth study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
98
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study support earlier research showing that a very large proportion of multi-vehicle bicycle (Räsänen and Summala, 1998) and motorcycle crashes involve right-ofway violations by other vehicles (ACEM, 2008;Comelli et al, 2008;Hurt et al, 1981;Johnston et al, 2008;Wells et al, 2004). Many of these crashes fall into the category of 'looked but failed to see' (LBFTS) or 'sorry mate I didn't see you' (SMIDSY) crashes (Broughton and Walker, 2009;Brown, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study support earlier research showing that a very large proportion of multi-vehicle bicycle (Räsänen and Summala, 1998) and motorcycle crashes involve right-ofway violations by other vehicles (ACEM, 2008;Comelli et al, 2008;Hurt et al, 1981;Johnston et al, 2008;Wells et al, 2004). Many of these crashes fall into the category of 'looked but failed to see' (LBFTS) or 'sorry mate I didn't see you' (SMIDSY) crashes (Broughton and Walker, 2009;Brown, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The analyses revealed general similarities in the road characteristics and crash types, with intersection from adjacent approaches being the most common crash type for both bicycles and motorcycles. Consistent with earlier research (ACEM, 2008;Comelli et al, 2008;Haque et al, 2009;Hurt et al, 1981;Johnston et al, 2008;Räsänen and Summala, 1998;Wells et al, 2004), drivers of other vehicles were coded most at fault in the majority of bicycle (57.0%) and motorcycle crashes (62.7%). This implies that two-wheeler safety improvement treatments need to focus not only on riders but also on drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous research suggests drivers primarily expect only to see other vehicles in the road and this assumption reduces driver attention and awareness of vulnerable road users when undertaking visual searches at junctions (Räsänen and Summala 1998;Herslund and Jorgensen 2003). On the whole most drivers, especially less experienced drivers, participating in the study did not expect to see horses, even on rural roads,…”
Section: Expectation and Entitlement To Use The Roadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possession of a full license has been shown to increase risk of bicycle accident involvement at junctions 127 .…”
Section: Driver Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that drivers often report not being aware of cyclists they collide with. An in-depth study of bicycle-car accidents reported that only 51% of car drivers had noticed the cyclist prior to the collision 127 . Detection of cyclists seems particularly poor when motor vehicles are pulling alongside the cyclist or approaching them from behind 180 95 140 .…”
Section: Conspicuity and Bicycle Crashesmentioning
confidence: 99%