2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating effects of arousal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
49
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, it is important to note that this finding is consistent with several other studies that have found that explicit sex words (Aquino & Arnell, 2007;Arnell, Killman, & Fijavz, 2007) and sexual images (Buodo, Sarlo, & Palomba, 2002) affect attention more strongly than threat stimuli. Nevertheless, other possible reasons may be sought in the specific qualities of our stimulus set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…First of all, it is important to note that this finding is consistent with several other studies that have found that explicit sex words (Aquino & Arnell, 2007;Arnell, Killman, & Fijavz, 2007) and sexual images (Buodo, Sarlo, & Palomba, 2002) affect attention more strongly than threat stimuli. Nevertheless, other possible reasons may be sought in the specific qualities of our stimulus set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Resultados similares se han encontrado en mujeres en comparación a los hombres (Fraga et al, 2011), lo que es coherente con los datos de nuestra investigación en donde las mujeres evaluaron como más aversivas las palabras desagradables, este mismo resultado se ha encontrado utilizando imágenes del iaPs (Bradley, Codispoti, Sabatinelli, & Lang, 2001;Gantiva et al, 2011;Vila et al, 2001), lo cual confirma el sesgo negativo de las mujeres hacia estímulos que indican amenaza. Por el contrario, todos los estudios muestran que las palabras con contenido sexual generan altas puntuaciones en valencia y arousal independiente de las características de la muestra (Aquino & Arnell, 2007;Arnell et al, 2007;Fraga et al, 2011;Harris & Pashler, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…We chose negative and positive words because the neural EEM in the amygdala is primarily driven by emotional arousal rather than valence (Kensinger and Schacter 2006). Sexual, threatening, and taboo words were not included, as it has been suggested that such stimuli might be preferentially processed (MacKay et al 2004;Aquino and Arnell 2007).The whole experiment consisted of three sessions, each with an encoding and a retrieval phase, which were scanned consecutively, but separated by a short break (due to space limitations the retrieval data will not be reported). To control for the relative distinctiveness of emotional items, the words from six lists (two Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press on May 12, 2018 -Published by learnmem.cshlp.org Downloaded from from each valence level) were presented during an encoding phase in a pure list design, i.e., all 12 words of the particular list were presented one after another for 3 sec each.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%