2021
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.3043267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention-Based Adaptive Spectral–Spatial Kernel ResNet for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [14] proposed an end-to-end cubic CNN, which applies convolutions in different directions of the feature volume to fully exploit spatial and spatial-spectral features. Driven by the goal of extracting and exploiting the best possible features, Alipour et al [15] and Roy et al [16] explored new architectural designs to make the convolutional kernel more flexible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [14] proposed an end-to-end cubic CNN, which applies convolutions in different directions of the feature volume to fully exploit spatial and spatial-spectral features. Driven by the goal of extracting and exploiting the best possible features, Alipour et al [15] and Roy et al [16] explored new architectural designs to make the convolutional kernel more flexible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the classification accuracy and real-time performance of the proposed ACAS2F2N, this paper compares the performance of 7 baselines. The specific description is as follows: A2S2KResNet 4 (TGRS, 2020), DBDA 13 (RS, 2020), PyResNet 18 (TGRS2019), DBMA 76 (RS, 2019), SSRN 14 (TGRS, 2018), FDSSC 15 (RS, 2018), ContextNet 17 (TIP, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 5 , 6 and 7 are the results of algorithm classification maps, which respectively illustrate the results of hyperspectral classification and classification color labels. The experiment selects 7 baseline algorithms for performance comparison, of which 7 baselines are A2S2KResNet 4 (TGRS, 2020), DBDA 13 (RS, 2020), PyResNet 18 (TGRS2019), DBMA 76 (RS, 2019), SSRN 14 (TGRS, 2018), FDSSC 15 (RS, 2018), and ContextNet 17 (TIP, 2017). Experimental results verify the effectiveness and real-time performance of the proposed ACAS2F2N.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compare with different methodsIn order to evaluate the performance of our proposed method MSDBFA, we select eight classification methods to compare with our model. The eight methods are support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis function kernel, multinomial logistic regression (MLR), random forest (RF), spectral CNN (CNN-1D), spatial CNN with 2-D kernels, Hybrid-SN[55], SSRN[40], A2S2KResnet[56]. Among them, SVM, RF and MLR are classical machine learning classification methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%