Attention control group activities and perceived benefit in a trial of a behavioral intervention for older adults

Abstract

Researchers trialing behavioral interventions often use attention control groups, but few publish details on attention control activities or perceived benefit. Attention control groups receive the same dose of interpersonal interaction as intervention participants but no other elements of the intervention, to control for the benefits of attention that may come from behavioral interventions. Because intervention success is analyzed compared to control conditions, it is useful to examine attention control content and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to report on attention control visit activities and their perceived benefit in a randomized control trial. The trial tested an aging‐in‐place intervention comprised of a series of participant goal‐directed visits facilitated by an occupational therapist, nurse, and handyman. The attention control group participants received visits from a lay person. We report on the number and length of visits received, types of visit activities that participants chose, and how much visit time was spent on each activity, based on the attention visitor's records. We report on participant perceptions of benefit based on a 10‐item Likert‐scale survey. The attention control group participants (n = 148) were cognitively intact, at least 65 years old, with at least one Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Attention control group participants most often chose conversation (20.1% of visit time), and playing games (18.7%), as visit activities. The majority of attention control group participants (63.4%) reported “a great deal” of perceived benefit. Attention control group visits may be an appropriate comparison in studies of behavioral interventions for community‐dwelling older adults.

The Effect of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Psychoeducation Only on Psychological Distress in Patients With Noncardiac Chest Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

“…This can be compared with other studies comparing iCBT with usual care or waiting list instead of an active control and reporting significant improvement in anxiety and depression in favor of iCBT [ 25 , 30 ]. Studies with passive controls, such as waiting list or standard care, often report better outcomes in favor of the intervention compared with those with active controls [ 56 ]. An important aspect to consider is how long the effects of psychoeducation last and whether more psychological tools, such as cognitive restructuring and behavioral change strategies, are needed to maintain long-term results.…”

Attention control in a trial of an online psychoeducational intervention for caregivers

“…Behavioral interventions include both the “active ingredient”—the component that is deemed to change the variables of interest—and nonspecific aspects, such as facilitators' attention. Therefore, comparison of the active condition with the attention control allows researchers to detect whether the impact of the intervention exceeds that of nonspecific aspects of facilitators' attention and social support between group participants (LaFave et al, 2019; Pagoto et al, 2013; Schwartz et al, 1997).…”

“…There is a call to increase reporting on attention control groups (LaFave et al, 2019), including in research focused on chronic health conditions (Juengst et al, 2020). Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe the development and implementation of and to examine the results associated with the attention control condition—Healthy Living— used in the Tele‐Savvy trial.…”

Guided self-determination intervention versus attention control for people with type 2 diabetes in outpatient clinics: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

“…3 Additionally, we provide up to five contacts with a research assistant trained in supportive communication techniques to the participants in the control group. The inclusion of an attention control group is meant to alleviate expectation bias and reduce attrition 27 as well as the effects of the Hawthorne effect. 28 …”