1966
DOI: 10.1126/science.151.3715.1246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention in the Newborn: Effect on Motility and Skin Potential

Abstract: Newborn infants showed lower motility and greater reactivity of the skin potential while attending to a visual target than when equally alert but inattentive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotational motion of a nearby non-fixated object interrupted overt attention to the fixated object, shortening the duration of looking by more than 80 percent, and facilitated the reorienting of gaze to the nearby object, increasing the likelihood that reorientation would occur and speeding it by more than a factor of 2 when it did occur. Ongoing body movement, already below baseline during fixation of the first object, was suppressed still further when the non-fixated object began to rotate and gaze had not yet shifted, consistent with the onset of a classic orienting reflex (Sokolov, 1958(Sokolov, / 1965(Sokolov, , 1965Stechler, Bradford, & Levy, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Rotational motion of a nearby non-fixated object interrupted overt attention to the fixated object, shortening the duration of looking by more than 80 percent, and facilitated the reorienting of gaze to the nearby object, increasing the likelihood that reorientation would occur and speeding it by more than a factor of 2 when it did occur. Ongoing body movement, already below baseline during fixation of the first object, was suppressed still further when the non-fixated object began to rotate and gaze had not yet shifted, consistent with the onset of a classic orienting reflex (Sokolov, 1958(Sokolov, / 1965(Sokolov, , 1965Stechler, Bradford, & Levy, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Until recently there was some question as to whether the GSR could be found in newborns. However, Crowell, Davis, Chun, and Spellacy (1965) and Stechler, Bradford, and Levy (1966) in a study cited above, both found the GSR by careful experimental preparation. Respiration has not received much attention as an orienting reaction component.…”
Section: Autonomic Responsesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The attractiveness of these theories to students of human development is increased by data suggesting the existence of invariance detectors in human newborns (Kessen, Haith, & Salapatek, 1965;Salapatek & Kessen, 1966), and by reports of qualitative differences in "looking" of younger and older infants: The younger infant seems to be "captured by the stimuli" (Ames & Silfen, 1965), to show "obligatory attention" (Stechler & Latz, 1966) in a "vigilant-like state" (Stechler, Bradford, & Levy, 1966); the older infant appears to be "capturing stimuli with his visual behavior" (Ames & Silfen, 1965), to become "aroused" or "excited" by visual stimulation (Stechler & Latz, 1966). Indeed, such differences in looking could reflect qualitatively different experiential states mediated by different neural mechanisms.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%