Reading as a Perceptual Process 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043642-5/50017-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention, Information Processing, and Eye Movement Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents an estimate of the lower bound of the time to achieve lexical access. At the other end of the timescale, results using the double step paradigm suggest that the amplitude of a saccade can be modified no later than 70±90 ms before the end of the current fixation (Deubel, O'Regan, & Radach, 2000). McConkie et al (1985) propose a visual stimulus influence deadline of 80±100 ms before the onset of the impending saccade.…”
Section: Theories and Models Of Eye Movement Control In Readingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This represents an estimate of the lower bound of the time to achieve lexical access. At the other end of the timescale, results using the double step paradigm suggest that the amplitude of a saccade can be modified no later than 70±90 ms before the end of the current fixation (Deubel, O'Regan, & Radach, 2000). McConkie et al (1985) propose a visual stimulus influence deadline of 80±100 ms before the onset of the impending saccade.…”
Section: Theories and Models Of Eye Movement Control In Readingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And, equally, , while certainly giving precedence to the role of lexical processing, acknowledge the part played by visuomotor factors in arguing for some kind of``hybrid model''. It may be more productive to view those eye movement patterns which are determined by purely visuomotor processing as providing a``carrier signal'' which can be modulated by cognitive influences (see also Deubel et al, 2000;Yang & McConkie, 2001). Reichle, Pollatsek, Fisher, and Rayner (1998) presented the first realistic algorithmic attention shift model of eye movement control in reading in the form of their E-Z Reader model.…”
Section: Theories and Models Of Eye Movement Control In Readingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well established that the gaze fixation durations, together with the position of the gaze, provide a measure of cognitive processing when performing an ongoing task, being positively correlated with cognitive load required for processing visual information (Rayner 1998;Deubel et al 2000;Jacob and Karn 2003;Hayhoe and Ballard 2005;Tatler et al 2011). Gaze fixations in visually guided manipulation allow very specific task-dependent acquisition of visual information (Triesch et al 2003).…”
Section: Fixation Durations At the Obstaclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, results from this line of research suggest that object-specific coupling of saccade programming and object discrimination is strong and mandatory. 3 This has led to the currently dominant view that a presaccadic shift of attention guides the selection of a peripheral item as the target of the saccade, thus constituting the initial step in the programming of a saccade (see Deubel, O'Regan, & Radach, 2000, for a recent discussion in the context of reading research). In contrast, the E-Z Reader model assumes that a saccade target is selected before an attention shift takes place.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Attention Shifting and Saccade Progmentioning
confidence: 99%