Proceedings of the 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design : Dr 2009
DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention Maintenance in Novice Drivers: Assessment and Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from driving simulators indicate significantly more correct glances at pre-determined areas of risk by trained than untrained drivers [21, 22], in both near and far transfer, immediately [13, 16] (e.g., near: 78% correct glances for trained v. 36% for untrained; far: 77% v. 44%) [13], and 3-5 days post training (near: 52% v. 29%; far: 53% v. 27%) [19]. In addition, Pradhan and colleagues [20] identified that although there was previous evidence that RAPT training improved hazard anticipation skills, it did not have an impact on measures of attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from driving simulators indicate significantly more correct glances at pre-determined areas of risk by trained than untrained drivers [21, 22], in both near and far transfer, immediately [13, 16] (e.g., near: 78% correct glances for trained v. 36% for untrained; far: 77% v. 44%) [13], and 3-5 days post training (near: 52% v. 29%; far: 53% v. 27%) [19]. In addition, Pradhan and colleagues [20] identified that although there was previous evidence that RAPT training improved hazard anticipation skills, it did not have an impact on measures of attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first train participants to schedule looks at the in-vehicle task that are no longer than three seconds and then train them to schedule looks that are no longer than two seconds. FOCAL has now been evaluated using a PC-based attention maintenance assessment program (AMAP) before and after training (Pradhan, Masserang, Divekar, Reagan, Thomas, Blomberg, Pollatsek, and Fisher, 2009). The results are striking (Blomberg, Thomas, Reagan, Fisher, Pollatsek, Pradhan, Romoser, Divekar, and Zafian, in review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one might reasonably argue that training novice drivers to scan the road ahead more closely, either for specific hazards (Pradhan et al, 2009a) or for more general hazards (Underwood et al, 2002, 2003), would alert such drivers to the importance of keeping glances inside the vehicle relatively short. But, curiously, there appears to be no effect of such training on the duration of in-vehicle glances, at least when the training is focused on hazard anticipation (Pradhan et al, 2009b, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%