2016
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616636416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention’s Accelerator

Abstract: How do we get attention to operate at peak efficiency in high-pressure situations? Here we tested the hypothesis that the general mechanism that allows us to drive attentional selection at peak efficiency is the maintenance of multiple target representations in working and long-term memory. We recorded subjects’ event-related potentials (ERPs) indexing the working memory and long-term memory representations people used to control attention while performing visual search. We show that people used both types of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On each trial, after a 1,000-ms fixation presentation, a horizontally aligned negative–neutral face pair was displayed for 500 ms with each face’s center being 60 pixels (visual angle: 1.7°) away from the fixation. A Landolt-C-like stimulus was used as the probe stimulus (Perlato, Santandrea, Della Libera, & Chelazzi, 2014; Thoern, Grueschow, Ehlert, Ruff, & Kleim, 2016), as it was frequently used in research on WM-driven attention selection (Hollingworth & Beck, 2016; Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2016; Woodman & Luck, 2007). That is, a gray circle contour with a gap at the top or bottom (line width: 3 pixels; gap width: 3 pixels; visual angle: .08°) appeared upon the disappearance of the faces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each trial, after a 1,000-ms fixation presentation, a horizontally aligned negative–neutral face pair was displayed for 500 ms with each face’s center being 60 pixels (visual angle: 1.7°) away from the fixation. A Landolt-C-like stimulus was used as the probe stimulus (Perlato, Santandrea, Della Libera, & Chelazzi, 2014; Thoern, Grueschow, Ehlert, Ruff, & Kleim, 2016), as it was frequently used in research on WM-driven attention selection (Hollingworth & Beck, 2016; Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2016; Woodman & Luck, 2007). That is, a gray circle contour with a gap at the top or bottom (line width: 3 pixels; gap width: 3 pixels; visual angle: .08°) appeared upon the disappearance of the faces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, investigators have argued that attention biases, working memory difficulties, and LTM biases may instigate pathogenic cycles of increasingly negative and less positive information-processing through their bidirectional influences (Wittenborn et al, 2016). Cognitive biases may then not operate in a stable trait-like manner, but rather fluctuate over time and contexts (Everaert, Bronstein, Cannon, & Joormann, 2018; Quinn & Joormann, 2015; Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2016; Zvielli, Bernstein, & Koster, 2014). This implies that the strength of the mutual influences between cognitive biases may also vary over time.…”
Section: Dynamic Features Of Attention and Memory Bias Interactions Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it should capture attention exogenously in a bottom-up manner, regardless of whether the target color matched the content of short-term memory (Gaspline et al, 2016;Theeuwes, 2000). The additional benefit of target color match with short-term memory provides an unambiguous support for top-down contribution to attention shifting that further accelerated attention shifting to the target (Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2016).…”
Section: Spatial Attention 25mentioning
confidence: 90%