2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0485-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention scales according to inferred real-world object size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, preparatory activity may be situationally invariant [19] . For example, preparatory activity may reflect a canonical (e.g., real-world) size of the target object, rather than its predicted -and variable -retinal image size [20,21] . Third, preparatory activity may incorporate the expected retinal size of the target object given the current viewing distance (i.e., more distant objects will produce a smaller retinal image).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, preparatory activity may be situationally invariant [19] . For example, preparatory activity may reflect a canonical (e.g., real-world) size of the target object, rather than its predicted -and variable -retinal image size [20,21] . Third, preparatory activity may incorporate the expected retinal size of the target object given the current viewing distance (i.e., more distant objects will produce a smaller retinal image).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although a real car and a toy car share similar visual appearances, actions on these two objects are completely different ( 8 ). Further, the feature of objects’ real-world size also provides important information for high-level cognitive processes, such as attention ( 33 ), numerical perceptions ( 34 ), and semantic knowledge ( 35 ). In short, our finding that the feature of objects’ real-world size served as an axis of object space thus may greatly expand our understanding of object recognition from the angle of vision for perception to a novel viewpoint of vision for action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining familiar landmarks, Epstein et al (2007) found that the PPA responds more strongly to landmarks than to other types objects, suggesting the space around the landmark is represented. More recently, researchers found a connection between an object and the space surrounding it (Collegio et al, 2019;Mullally & Maguire, 2011, 2013. Mullally and Maguire (2013) demonstrated that certain objects (referred to as space-defining objects) evoked depictions of the surrounding three-dimensional space (e.g., oak bed) when they were either viewed or imagined in isolation.…”
Section: Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%