2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional bias for affective visual stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder and the role of depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, traditional aggregated mean bias scores towards/away from angry faces at post-deployment did not predict PTS post-deployment; only traditional aggregated mean bias scores towards happy faces at post-deployment, as a function of number of intermediate traumatic experiences, were concurrently related to PTS at post-deployment. Thus, the present findings may help to disambiguate extant mixed findings to date-wherein some studies implicated AB towards threat in PTS, [5,6,8,9,21] others AB away from threat PTS, [10][11][12][13] and yet others found no role for aggregated mean estimates of AB in PTS. [14,15] If, as we observed, AB to emotionally arousing stimuli is characterized by within-subject temporal fluctuation between AB towards emotion stimuli and AB away from those emotion stimuli, and precisely this temporal variability in AB reflects attentional dysregulation subserving PTS, then traditional aggregated mean bias scores estimating AB are likely to lead to mixed and sometimes null effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, traditional aggregated mean bias scores towards/away from angry faces at post-deployment did not predict PTS post-deployment; only traditional aggregated mean bias scores towards happy faces at post-deployment, as a function of number of intermediate traumatic experiences, were concurrently related to PTS at post-deployment. Thus, the present findings may help to disambiguate extant mixed findings to date-wherein some studies implicated AB towards threat in PTS, [5,6,8,9,21] others AB away from threat PTS, [10][11][12][13] and yet others found no role for aggregated mean estimates of AB in PTS. [14,15] If, as we observed, AB to emotionally arousing stimuli is characterized by within-subject temporal fluctuation between AB towards emotion stimuli and AB away from those emotion stimuli, and precisely this temporal variability in AB reflects attentional dysregulation subserving PTS, then traditional aggregated mean bias scores estimating AB are likely to lead to mixed and sometimes null effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Other studies have found associations between AB away from threat and PTS. [10][11][12][13] Yet other studies reported null associations between AB and PTS. [14,15] A novel approach to the study of AB may help to clarify the associations between AB and the development and maintenance of PTS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding conflicts with the theoretical assumption of hypervigilance in PTSD (Pineles et al, 2009 ). However, the latter two paradigms are also plagued by interpretational problems (see Hauschildt et al, 2013 , for a further discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence is in accord with the resource allocation model of PTSD that theorizes an attentional bias to trauma‐related threat stimuli at the expense of attention to neutral information (Ehlers & Clark, ; Foa, Steketee, & Olasov‐Rothbaum, ). Some PTSD research studies using behavioral experimental procedures, such as the emotional Stroop (Cisler et al., ) and dot probe (Fani et al., ) tasks, provide evidence supporting the model, while studies that used other behavioral measures report no PTSD‐related effects (Hauschildt, Wittekind, Moritz, Keller, & Jelinek, ; Kimble, Frueh, & Marks, ; Wittekind, Muhtz, Jelinek, & Moritz, ). The resource allocation model concurs with neurocognitive conceptualizations of PTSD, such as the neurocircuitry model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%