2012
DOI: 10.15842/kjcp.2012.31.1.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional Bias for Threat Stimuli in High-Trait Anxious Individuals: Using Eye-Tracker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Twenty-seven real-life pictures were selected in which a person threatening situation was the center of focus, along with 27 neutral pictures in which a person was shown in a situation unrelated to any threat or fear. Thereafter, 13 graduate and undergraduate students rated the threatening and neutral stimuli for their arousal and emotional valence levels on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not threatening at all,” negative”) to 7 (“very threatening,” positive), following the stimuli rating procedure used in a study by Hahm and Lee (2012). For the final pictorial stimuli, 15 threatening pictorial stimuli of a rating of five points or above were selected in descending order of arousal level ( M = 6.27 , SD = 0.50), and 15 neutral pictorial stimuli with emotional valence levels close to the midrange were selected ( M = 5.42 , SD = 0.28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Twenty-seven real-life pictures were selected in which a person threatening situation was the center of focus, along with 27 neutral pictures in which a person was shown in a situation unrelated to any threat or fear. Thereafter, 13 graduate and undergraduate students rated the threatening and neutral stimuli for their arousal and emotional valence levels on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not threatening at all,” negative”) to 7 (“very threatening,” positive), following the stimuli rating procedure used in a study by Hahm and Lee (2012). For the final pictorial stimuli, 15 threatening pictorial stimuli of a rating of five points or above were selected in descending order of arousal level ( M = 6.27 , SD = 0.50), and 15 neutral pictorial stimuli with emotional valence levels close to the midrange were selected ( M = 5.42 , SD = 0.28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…최근에는 외상 경험자들에 게서 관찰된 위협자극에 빠르게 주의(attention)가 개입되는 주의편향(attentional bias)이 PTSD의 핵심요소로 지목되고 있다 (Pineles SL et al, 2009;Thomas CL et al, 2013). 주의는 새로운 정보의 지각이나 학습과 같은 인지적 처리 (cognitive process)의 근본적 요소로 (Hahm JS et al, 2012), 후방주의체계(posterior attentional system)와 전방 주의체계(anterior attentional system)로 구분될 수 있다 (Petersen SE et al, 2012). 후방주의체계는 주의의 방향을 설정하는 곳으로 한 자극에 머물러 있던 주의의 탈개입 (disengage), 다른 자극으로의 이동(move), 그리고 새로운 자극에 주의를 개입시키는(engage) 과정이 포함된다.…”
unclassified