2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional biases to emotional stimuli: Key components of the RDoC constructs of sustained threat and loss

Abstract: Biased attention to emotional stimuli plays a key role in the RDoC constructs of Sustained Threat and Loss. In this article, we review approaches to assessing these biases, their links with psychopathology, and the underlying neural influences. We then review evidence from twin and candidate gene studies regarding genetic influences on attentional biases. We also discuss the impact of developmental and environmental influences and end with a number of suggestions for future research in this area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
72
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(211 reference statements)
9
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In testing these theories, the majority of research has focused on attentional biases in depression and anxiety. These studies consistently demonstrate the presence of attentional biases for threat-relevant information in anxiety disorders, perhaps particularly in terms of initial orienting of attention, and attentional bias for depression-relevant information (e.g., sad faces) in depression, particularly in terms of increased sustained attention to, or difficulty disengaging attention from, these stimuli (for reviews, see Armstrong & Olatunji, 2012; Bar-Haim et al, 2007; Gibb et al, 2016; Peckham et al, 2010). This highlights the disorder-specific nature of attentional biases both in terms of focus (threat-relevant vs. depression-relevant) and time course (initial orienting vs. sustained attention).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In testing these theories, the majority of research has focused on attentional biases in depression and anxiety. These studies consistently demonstrate the presence of attentional biases for threat-relevant information in anxiety disorders, perhaps particularly in terms of initial orienting of attention, and attentional bias for depression-relevant information (e.g., sad faces) in depression, particularly in terms of increased sustained attention to, or difficulty disengaging attention from, these stimuli (for reviews, see Armstrong & Olatunji, 2012; Bar-Haim et al, 2007; Gibb et al, 2016; Peckham et al, 2010). This highlights the disorder-specific nature of attentional biases both in terms of focus (threat-relevant vs. depression-relevant) and time course (initial orienting vs. sustained attention).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is consistent with the finding for sad faces, as avoidance of positive stimuli is also a feature of depressive symptomatology 28 . While there was no association between inflammation and angry faces, the stimuli in our study were presented for 1000ms, a relatively long exposure time that likely captures processes central to depression (like difficulty disengaging from negative stimuli or avoidance of positive stimuli 28 ) rather than processes central to anxiety (like initial orientation towards threatening stimuli) 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Attentional bias was assessed using a dot-probe task, which is widely used in clinical and non-clinical populations 9,20 . In this task, a dot is presented on either the right or left side of a computer screen, and participants indicate which side of the screen the dot is on as quickly and accurately as possible by pressing the “j” or “f” key.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations