1989
DOI: 10.1016/0191-2607(89)90013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
87
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dingus et al, 1989). Finally, in order to facilitate behavioural change for a hypothetical IVIS smart driving advisor (such as Foot-LITE), the feedback provided should be positive as well as negative (van Driel et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dingus et al, 1989). Finally, in order to facilitate behavioural change for a hypothetical IVIS smart driving advisor (such as Foot-LITE), the feedback provided should be positive as well as negative (van Driel et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many functions of modern satellite navigation systems take considerably longer to complete and require more glances compared to conventional controls and displays (such as headlights and windscreen wipers, or visually checking the speed and fuel gauge). A series of related studies (Antin, 1993;Dingus et al, 1989;Wierwille et al, 1991) attempted to assess the visual attentional demand of moving-map displays relative to other in-car tasks.…”
Section: Satellite Navigation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Off-road glances exceeding two seconds during a safety-critical event doubles the risk of crashes/near-crashes (Klauer et al, 2006). Controlled experiments also showed that long off-road glances lead to larger lane deviations and slower responses to lead-vehicle braking (Dingus et al, 1989;Donmez et al, 2007). In general, individual glances that exceed two seconds have been considered as critical for secondary tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), can also change the demand of the primary task of driving. There is also evidence that in-cab tasks differ in the visual demand they place on the driver (Rockwell, 1988;Dingus et al, 1989). It is clear that virtually any in-cab task will demand greater attention away from the driving task than driving without in-cab device use (Dingus & Hulse, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%