2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional fluctuations and the temporal organization of memory

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We explored participants' recall transitions to estimate two measures of temporal associations at retrieval: forward asymmetry bias and temporal contiguity effects. We first tested for potential age differences in forward asymmetry via a 2-way mixed ANOVA on the lag-CRP measures with age group as the between-subjects factor and direction of transition at the closest lags ±1 (forward vs. backward) as a within-subjects factor (for a similar analysis see Jayakumar et al, 2023). We found a significant main effect of direction in both the original [(F(1, 43) = 220.69, p < 0.001] and replication samples [(F(1,51) = 329.81, p < 0.001], suggesting a strong forward asymmetry for both younger and older adults (see Figure 4).…”
Section: Temporal Organization Of Events In Episodic Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explored participants' recall transitions to estimate two measures of temporal associations at retrieval: forward asymmetry bias and temporal contiguity effects. We first tested for potential age differences in forward asymmetry via a 2-way mixed ANOVA on the lag-CRP measures with age group as the between-subjects factor and direction of transition at the closest lags ±1 (forward vs. backward) as a within-subjects factor (for a similar analysis see Jayakumar et al, 2023). We found a significant main effect of direction in both the original [(F(1, 43) = 220.69, p < 0.001] and replication samples [(F(1,51) = 329.81, p < 0.001], suggesting a strong forward asymmetry for both younger and older adults (see Figure 4).…”
Section: Temporal Organization Of Events In Episodic Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that more consistent response times (RTs) close to a person's overall mean RT correspond to engaged attention. In contrast, more erratic responding (including both overly fast and slow responses) predict attention lapses and disengaged focus (Esterman et al, 2013;Rosenberg et al, 2013;Fortenbaugh et al, 2015;Kucyi et al, 2017;Jayakumar et al, 2023). Thus, fluctuating VTC values, calculated as the absolute deviation of each RT from the participant mean, are thought to reflect fluctuating sustained attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%