2009
DOI: 10.1080/13546800902757936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional modulation of perceptual organisation in schizophrenia

Abstract: These results suggest that lateral connections are impaired in early visual cortex of schizophrenia patients. This deficit cannot be restored by top-down attentional modulation of target-flanker interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We opted to present the stimulus on every trial rather than use a two-interval forced choice since qualitatively the same results arise in the two cases (Keri, Kelemen, et al, 2005), and since the former allows for a shorter experiment. A 1-up, 3-down staircase determined the threshold, the amount of contrast needed to detect the stimulus with 79.4% accuracy (Keri et al, 2009; Keri, Kelemen, et al, 2005; Keri, Kiss, et al, 2005; Must et al, 2004). Specifically, in the event of one incorrect response (miss), the contrast between the background and the central Gabor increased by 0.1 log units (26%) and in the event of three consecutive correct responses (hit), the contrast decreased by the same amount.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We opted to present the stimulus on every trial rather than use a two-interval forced choice since qualitatively the same results arise in the two cases (Keri, Kelemen, et al, 2005), and since the former allows for a shorter experiment. A 1-up, 3-down staircase determined the threshold, the amount of contrast needed to detect the stimulus with 79.4% accuracy (Keri et al, 2009; Keri, Kelemen, et al, 2005; Keri, Kiss, et al, 2005; Must et al, 2004). Specifically, in the event of one incorrect response (miss), the contrast between the background and the central Gabor increased by 0.1 log units (26%) and in the event of three consecutive correct responses (hit), the contrast decreased by the same amount.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that the individual elements in clinical CG studies are Gabor patches—that is, oriented sinusoidal luminance gratings multiplied with a circularly symmetric Gaussian kernel—and the carrier frequencies were almost always below 8.3 cycles/deg. In some cases, the SF was 6.7 cycles/deg (Keri, Kelemen, & Benedek, 2009; Keri, Kelemen, Benedek, & Janka, 2005; Keri, Kiss, Kelemen, Benedek, & Janka, 2005; Must, Janka, Benedek, & Keri, 2004); in other cases, it was 5 cycles/deg (Kozma-Wiebe et al, 2006; Silverstein et al, 2009; Silverstein, Kovacs, Corry, & Valone, 2000), and in still other cases, it was less than 4 cycles/deg (Robol et al, 2013; Schallmo, Sponheim, & Olman, 2013). It is thus entirely possible that the reason that patients perform poorly in grouping tasks owes not to an integration deficit per se , but to a problem in detecting or accurately representing the elements integrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to controls, patients demonstrate reduced facilitatory effects of collinear flankers on detection of a target at short target-flanker distances (Kéri et al, 2005). They also show lack of attentional modulation of this effect (Kéri et al, 2009), which is a further example of the reduced effects of modulatory amplification. Such patients also need more of the contours to be present to identify objects, so that is further evidence of impaired disambiguation (Doniger, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Contextual Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research on the neurobiology of these impairments suggests that they involve reduced binding of visual features in areas of the occipital lobe with large receptive fields (e.g., V4 and lateral occipital complex) [9,18] , involving weakened synchronization of neuronal oscillations within the γ-band [19] . While in some cases, reduced perceptual organization appears to be independent of attention [20] , in other cases there are clear effects of reduced effects of expectation on the structuring of the visual field [13] , suggesting poor integration of top-down signals and of gain (from attention) with sensory input.…”
Section: Perceptual Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%