2022
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentive Variational Information Bottleneck for TCR–peptide interaction prediction

Abstract: Motivation We present a multi-sequence generalization of Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) (Alemi et al., 2016) and call the resulting model Attentive Variational Information Bottleneck (AVIB). Our AVIB model leverages multi-head self-attention (Vaswani et al., 2017) to implicitly approximate a posterior distribution over latent encodings conditioned on multiple input sequences. We apply AVIB to a fundamental immuno-oncology problem: predicting the interactions between T cell receptors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our experiments, two state-of-the-art deep learning models for TCR-peptide interaction prediction: NetTCR-2.0 Jurtz et al (2018) and AVIB Grazioli et al (2022a). We evaluated how their performance is affected by training and testing on different data splits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For our experiments, two state-of-the-art deep learning models for TCR-peptide interaction prediction: NetTCR-2.0 Jurtz et al (2018) and AVIB Grazioli et al (2022a). We evaluated how their performance is affected by training and testing on different data splits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate non-binding (i.e., negative) samples, we randomly shuffled the available (peptide, CDR3- β ) pairs. This process is commonly employed in the literature (Jurtz et al, 2018; Grazioli et al, 2022a) and leverages the hypothesis that random pairs will most likely not bind. To create a balanced dataset, we randomly generated 36,641 samples of non-binding combinations of CDR3- β and peptide sequences, increasing the total number of data points to 65,946.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more complex modification would be the simulation of the tumor microenvironment, especially T cell response. Diversity in T cell repertoire could be used as a proxy ( Azizi et al 2018 , Han et al 2020 ) or even prediction of neoantigen-specific T cell receptors ( Montemurro et al 2022 , Grazioli et al 2023 ), although this is currently not a feasible approach due to the limited reliability of current TCR binding prediction algorithms ( Grazioli et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are simple models such as Bayesian non-parametric model [1], Random Forest (TCRex [2], epiTCR [3]), and clustering-based models (TCRdist [4,5]). More complex models [5,6,7,8] are also proposed for the classification task. Many deep learning models (NetTCR [9], DeepTCR [7], ImRex [8], tcrpred [10]) rely on convolutional neural networks to learn the TCR and peptide patterns in each interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%