IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition 2018
DOI: 10.2118/189657-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuating Heave-Induced Pressure Oscillations using Automated Down-hole Choking

Abstract: In this paper, a new tool to be placed in the bottomhole assembly (BHA) is introduced for the purpose of counteracting heave-induced down-hole pressure oscillations in offshore drilling. The tool contains a control choke, sensors and computing capability, and will operate autonomously with minimal implications for standard drilling procedures. A small-scale prototype is developed and successfully tested in laboratory experiments showing significant reduction in down-hole pressure oscillations. Realistic, full-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is almost no error between real heave velocity and the velocity estimated from acceleration measurements. In practice, small error between actual and estimated heave velocity will be a requirement on the hardware used, although first lab-scale experiments (see also Figure 5 in Kvernland, Christensen, Borgen, Godhavn, Aamo, Sangesland, et al (2018)) suggest that the heave velocity can be estimated relatively accurately in such a fashion and even better results should be expected with higher-quality hardware. Heave-estimator design tradeoffs taking into consideration the magnitude of noise and bias are also discussed in Godhaven (1998).…”
Section: Heave Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is almost no error between real heave velocity and the velocity estimated from acceleration measurements. In practice, small error between actual and estimated heave velocity will be a requirement on the hardware used, although first lab-scale experiments (see also Figure 5 in Kvernland, Christensen, Borgen, Godhavn, Aamo, Sangesland, et al (2018)) suggest that the heave velocity can be estimated relatively accurately in such a fashion and even better results should be expected with higher-quality hardware. Heave-estimator design tradeoffs taking into consideration the magnitude of noise and bias are also discussed in Godhaven (1998).…”
Section: Heave Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches still use a top-side choke for pressure control, and neither solve issues that arise when drilling from floating installations; heaveinduced downhole pressure oscillations. b) Another approach is to use a downhole valve to reduce the pressure oscillations (Kvernland, 2018). c) For deep water, a reduced liquid level in the drilling riser (as opposed to increased backpressure topside) is used to control downhole pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%