1986
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1986.13400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation and ratio—National standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, instead of performing the accurate measurements to have imprecise knowledge of this system used, adding a further term to uncertainty budget as mismatch uncertainty is recommended. Formulas for estimating mismatch uncertainty are derived in terms of reflection coefficients, VSWRs and S-parameters and evaluated earlier in [19][20][21][22][23]. These formulas were developed in accordance to the measurement parameter, its measuring system and the system for measuring the components of formulas.…”
Section: Importance Of Mismatch Uncertainty For Calibration Laboratoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, instead of performing the accurate measurements to have imprecise knowledge of this system used, adding a further term to uncertainty budget as mismatch uncertainty is recommended. Formulas for estimating mismatch uncertainty are derived in terms of reflection coefficients, VSWRs and S-parameters and evaluated earlier in [19][20][21][22][23]. These formulas were developed in accordance to the measurement parameter, its measuring system and the system for measuring the components of formulas.…”
Section: Importance Of Mismatch Uncertainty For Calibration Laboratoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the measured insertion loss and attenuation is termed as the mismatch error and is defined in terms of complex independent variables as [6,8,19],…”
Section: For Flat Attenuation Ie Fixed Attenuatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation