1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00878633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation and source parameters at Deception Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) and is characterized by a significant sesimic activity, mainly represented by small magnitude local events. Main general geophysical and seismic features of Deception Island have been deduced by ORTIZ et al (1992) and VILA et al (1992VILA et al ( , 1995. It is of interest for the present study that, averaged over a few days, the rate of energy release is constant, suggesting a stationary event occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1) and is characterized by a significant sesimic activity, mainly represented by small magnitude local events. Main general geophysical and seismic features of Deception Island have been deduced by ORTIZ et al (1992) and VILA et al (1992VILA et al ( , 1995. It is of interest for the present study that, averaged over a few days, the rate of energy release is constant, suggesting a stationary event occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In order to define a physical model compatible with these characteristics of the seismicity, it is also necessary to consider three main geophysical observations made in previous studies of Deception Island ORTIZ et al, 1992;VILA et al, 1995): 1) The energy flux is constant: there is a constant energy release and also a constant supply of energy from the magma sources and from the tectonic movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be pointed out that the high-frequency observed in tremor seismograms may be detected only close to the source because of the high seismic attenuation of most volcanic areas (Q as low as 11, see e.g. Vila et al, 1995). Therefore, the source must be located very close to the array site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%