Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information , 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)8 April 2013 (From -To)
REPORT TYPE
Final Report
DATES COVERED
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine Exhibition Road London, U K SW7 2BT
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBERN/A
SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)EOARD Unit 4515 BOX 14 APO AE 09421
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)AFRL/AFOSR/IOE (EOARD)
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
AFRL-AFOSR-UK-TR-2013-001512. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTAn investigation was undertaken to examine the application of a laser beam scanning methodology on the measurement of the time-averaged spray spatial structure. This approach can directly reduce secondary light scattering effects from the spray droplets and can take into account probe laser beam and scattered light intensity attenuation in order to reduce associated uncertainties on the spray characteristics. Evaluation of two approaches was performed, where one considered scanning the probe laser beam across the spray and the other considered traversing the spray while the probing beam and the imaging optics were fixed. It is determined that for the purposes of evaluating the methodology for correcting quantitative measurement errors due to attenuation, the second approach is more appropriate. This is because scanning the beam would require constant refocusing of the imaging system to the probed region. Another issue is the changing imaging resolution as the distance between the probe laser beam and the imaging optics is constantly changing. By traversing the spray across the probe beam, both of the aforementioned effects are eliminated and the signal correction methodology can be applied directly. The scattered light intensity correction methodology was successfully applied to a flat spray with measurements close to the nozzle and beam probing along the long dimension of the spray, so that attenuation effects are more profound. It is determined that attenuation of the laser beam along the spray can be as high as 20% and attenuation of the measured int...