1999
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1998.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of Cavity Flow Oscillation Through Leading Edge Flow Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow field features boundary layer separation, shear layer instability, vortex flow, acoustics radiation, shock/expansion wave and shock-boundarylayer interactions, and self-sustained pressure oscillations. The co-presence of and interaction among these features in such a simple configuration and their potential hazardous effects on the performance, integrity, and stability of the vehicles present a challenging problem and have stimulated extensive experimental, analytical, 8,9,24,[37][38][39][40] and computational [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] investigations over the years. These studies largely concentrated on mean static-pressure distributions and/or unsteady-pressure spectra in cavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow field features boundary layer separation, shear layer instability, vortex flow, acoustics radiation, shock/expansion wave and shock-boundarylayer interactions, and self-sustained pressure oscillations. The co-presence of and interaction among these features in such a simple configuration and their potential hazardous effects on the performance, integrity, and stability of the vehicles present a challenging problem and have stimulated extensive experimental, analytical, 8,9,24,[37][38][39][40] and computational [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] investigations over the years. These studies largely concentrated on mean static-pressure distributions and/or unsteady-pressure spectra in cavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of control methods have been tested and their effects on the cavity flow field documented. 1,9,31,36,54,55) Past researches have established that the defining parameter for these flows is their length-to-depth ratio (L/D). The effects of cavity width-to-length ratio (L/W ) were investigated by Ahuja and Mendoza, 28) Tracy and Plentovich, 30) Stallings and Wilcox, 2) et al Ahuja and Mendoza distinguished the cavity flow to be two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) depending on whether its L/W is less than or greater than 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many passive actuators applied until now, such as sawtooth spoilers [5,18], static or oscillating fences [19,20], leadingand trailing-edge ramps [18,21], and rods [19,22]; and they have been proved efficient in disrupting the feedback loop and reducing cavity resonance. They come with limitations though, since they can only be effective under certain flow conditions and most of the time they have associated penalties of increased drag and/or weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past experiments [3][4][5] and numerical studies 2,6 have tested a range of suppression strategies for cavity flows. These have included the use of ramps, [7][8][9][10][11] spoilers, rods 12 and air jets 4, 13, 14 located mainly on the upstream bulkhead, to affect the oncoming boundary layer approaching the enclosure. Some configurations considered ramps located at the downstream bulkhead, to alter the reattachment of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%