Aim: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been shown to attenuate the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to compare the antiplatelet effects of cilostazol versus clopidogrel in patients co-administered a PPI. Methods: We enrolled PPI-naïve stented patients treated with standard clopidogrel and aspirin therapy for at least six months (n = 100). The patients were randomly assigned to receive either cilostazol at a dose of 100 mg twice daily (CILO group) or clopidogrel at a dose of 75 mg daily (CLPD group) in addition to lansoprazole (30 mg daily). The platelet aggregation (PA) determined using light transmittance aggregometry and the platelet reactivity index (PRI) obtained using a vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay were measured before randomization and at the 14-day follow-up visit. The primary endpoint was the PRI value at follow-up. Results: At follow-up, the CLPD group showed similar values of PRI as the CILO group (66.9±14.0% vs. 63.1±14.1%; mean difference: 3.9%; 95% confidence interval of difference: −1.7% to 9.4%; p=0.174). However, the 6 μg/mL collagen-and 0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid-induced PA values in the CLPD group were higher than those observed in the CILO group (mean differences: 9.8% to 11.1%; all p values <0.001). CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriage was the major contributing factor associated with the PRI level in the absence of lansoprazole treatment (with a gene-dose effect); this association was not observed in the subjects receiving lansoprazole co-administration in the CLPD group. Conclusions: During lansoprazole co-administration, cilostazol treatment achieves a more favorable platelet function profile than clopidogrel therapy. The use of combination treatment with cilostazol and aspirin deserves further attention with respect to the management of stable stented patients requiring PPI co-administration.
IntroductionDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) Park Y and Jung JM contributed equally to this work. cilostazol compared with that of ADP P2Y12 receptor blockers and the findings of a previous report of healthy subjects showing relatively lower inhibitory effects of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation by cilostazol than with clopidogrel 18) may limit its clinical application in stented patients. Since cilostazol is also metabolized by the CYP2C19 enzyme 19) , the CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and/or concomitant use of a PPI may influence its pharmacodynamic effect.In the current study, we therefore evaluated the influence of lansoprazole administration on the effects of clopidogrel and compared the pharmacodynamic actions of cilostazol vs. clopidogrel treatment during PPI co-administration in patients with a history of coronary stenting.
Methods
Patient Selection and Study DesignThis ACCEL-PARAZOL (phArmacodynamic effect of Cilos...