2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04363.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of high frequencyPandSwaves in the crust of the East-Central Iran

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe simultaneously estimated Q p −1 and Q s −1 by applying the extended coda-normalization method at 39 stations of three local networks in the East-Central Iran. We measured frequencydependent attenuation of both P and S waves for the frequency range of 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12 and 24 Hz. We have analysed 266 three-component seismograms of 53 local earthquakes, having focal depths less than 25 km, which occurred from 2003 December 28 to 2005 April 11. By fitting power-law frequency dependence to the esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2007); NE Sonora, Mexico (Castro et al . 2008); east central Iran (Ma’hood et al . 2009); Cairo, Egypt (Abdel‐Fattah 2009) and Garhwal Himalaya (Padhy 2009 a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2007); NE Sonora, Mexico (Castro et al . 2008); east central Iran (Ma’hood et al . 2009); Cairo, Egypt (Abdel‐Fattah 2009) and Garhwal Himalaya (Padhy 2009 a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006 for Q −1 S ), Koyna, India (Sharma et al . 2007), Bhuj, India (Padhy 2009b), Cairo, Egypt (Abdel‐Fattah 2009) and east‐central Iran (Ma’hood et al . 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To invert phase and group velocity dispersions, we used the average Q S structural models to avoid anelastic dispersion effect. The average values of Q S are taken from the literature as ∼25 and ∼55 for crust and upper mantle (Cong and Mitchell, 1998;Motazedian, 2006;Rahimi and Hamzehloo, 2008;Ma'hood et al, 2009;Rahimi et al, 2009Rahimi et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Constructing the Starting Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the simulations are performed for rock conditions in both host and target regions in order to avoid the local site effects which might not be accurately obtained or incorporated. Table 4 displays the seismological parameters used in scenario events for Iran and Turkey which are adopted from Ma'hood et al (2009), Ugurhan and Askan (2010), and Askan et al (2013). We note that the seismological parameters in host regions adopted from these references Generic rock conditions Generic rock conditions were validated robustly against observations in simulations of several past earthquakes.…”
Section: Hybrid-empirical Ground Motion Analyses For Georgiamentioning
confidence: 99%