2018
DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.454777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation Parameters and Effective Atomic Numbers of Concretes Containing Pumice for Some Photon Energies by Experiment, Simulation and Calculation

Abstract: Photon mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers for three types of concretes containing pumice mineral in different rates (namely 0%, 50% and 100%) were studied by photon transmission experiments, by simulations and by theoretical calculations. Experimental procedure was realized by using a 3ʺ×3ʺ NaI(Tl) connected to a 16k multichannel analyzer detector system for 511, 835 and 1275 keV photon energies. In simulations, Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit was used to estimate the total mass a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all shields A to G, the attenuation reduction showed no intrinsic differences between the studied samples at 661.7 keV; becoming close, independent of the energy. The μ values varied highly according to the absorption and scattering mechanism of the X-rays; this variation depends strongly on the incoming photon energy and Z of the material [ 17 ]. Therefore, the attenuation efficiency for the shields with fillers was evident compared to the pure EVA in the lower energy region, where the predominant mechanism is photoelectric absorption [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all shields A to G, the attenuation reduction showed no intrinsic differences between the studied samples at 661.7 keV; becoming close, independent of the energy. The μ values varied highly according to the absorption and scattering mechanism of the X-rays; this variation depends strongly on the incoming photon energy and Z of the material [ 17 ]. Therefore, the attenuation efficiency for the shields with fillers was evident compared to the pure EVA in the lower energy region, where the predominant mechanism is photoelectric absorption [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%