1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00876442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in the Himalayan region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have found that the attenuation of peak accelerations with distance in the western US is in agreement with that in the western Himalayan region, whereas for the eastern part, the level is three times higher. Aman et al (1995) and Singh et al (1996) also found the similar results for the Himalayan regions. This is one explanation why Bhatia et al (1999) estimate lower values for the eastern Himalayan region while Khattri et al (1984) estimates slightly higher values for the western and central Himalayas.…”
Section: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Of the Indian Subconsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…They have found that the attenuation of peak accelerations with distance in the western US is in agreement with that in the western Himalayan region, whereas for the eastern part, the level is three times higher. Aman et al (1995) and Singh et al (1996) also found the similar results for the Himalayan regions. This is one explanation why Bhatia et al (1999) estimate lower values for the eastern Himalayan region while Khattri et al (1984) estimates slightly higher values for the western and central Himalayas.…”
Section: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Of the Indian Subconsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the western Himalayan region, strong motion network has recorded only three earthquakes. Based on the database of these earthquakes, SINGH et al (1996); SHARMA (1998) and PARVEZ et al (2001) have developed empirical and theoretical laws to define attenuation of peak ground motion in the Himalayan region. Using the empirical relations by SINGH et al (1996); SHARMA (1998) and ABRAHAMSON and LITEHISER (1989), the following Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) is calculated for the Uttarkashi and the Chamoli earthquake's: Vol.…”
Section: Scaling Laws and Their Applicability In The Source Region Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the database of these earthquakes, SINGH et al (1996); SHARMA (1998) and PARVEZ et al (2001) have developed empirical and theoretical laws to define attenuation of peak ground motion in the Himalayan region. Using the empirical relations by SINGH et al (1996); SHARMA (1998) and ABRAHAMSON and LITEHISER (1989), the following Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) is calculated for the Uttarkashi and the Chamoli earthquake's: Vol. 161, 2004A Simplified Technique 1785 where, N is the total number of observations, A fi and A si are the observed and calculated peak ground acceleration values at i-th station.…”
Section: Scaling Laws and Their Applicability In The Source Region Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistic results visa-vis complexity and computational as well as data requirement are the deciding factors for applicability of a particular technique. Some of the techniques widely used include: (i) stochastic approach (Boore and Atkinson, 1987;Beresnev and Atkinson, 1997;Motazedian and Atkinson, 2005), (ii) Green functions method (Bouchon and Aki, 1977), (iii) empirical Green functions method (Hartzell, 1978;Irikura, 1983), (iv) finite difference method (Panza, 1985;Oprsal and Zahradnik, 2002), (v) finite element method (Frankel, 1989), (2002), Singh et al (1996), and Chandrasekaran (1994) for Himalayas, Atkinson and Boore (1995) for East North America, Ambraseys (1995) for Europe, Joyner and Boore (1981) for California, Nath et al (2005) for Sikkim Himalaya, and Nath et al (2009) and (vi) spectral element method (Komatitsch and Tromp, 1999).…”
Section: Strong Motion Synthesis and Deterministic Seismic Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%