2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude control of rigid spacecraft with predefined-time stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm (19) is directly studied on a high‐order nonlinear strict‐feedback system with disturbance in (8). It can be seen that system (8) is more general than the first‐order systems, the second‐order systems, or the high‐order chain of integrators in traditional predefined‐time control studies 5‐14,17,21 The proposed algorithm (19) always takes effect on t ≥ 0.…”
Section: Predefined‐time Backstepping Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed algorithm (19) is directly studied on a high‐order nonlinear strict‐feedback system with disturbance in (8). It can be seen that system (8) is more general than the first‐order systems, the second‐order systems, or the high‐order chain of integrators in traditional predefined‐time control studies 5‐14,17,21 The proposed algorithm (19) always takes effect on t ≥ 0.…”
Section: Predefined‐time Backstepping Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No unbounded term is involved when the time tends to T 1 compared with traditional predefined‐time methods 18‐20 If the initial output tracking error satisfies y (0) − y d (0) ≠ 0 and the time‐varying tuning function ρ (t) is selected as (14), then according to (26), the upper bound of settling time T 1 is also exactly the system settling time under the proposed algorithm (19), so T 1 is not conservatively estimated compared with traditional predefined‐time algorithms 3‐14 The only parameter in algorithm (19) is the predefined‐time T 1 .…”
Section: Predefined‐time Backstepping Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the nonsmooth/finite‐time control approaches 17 (the control law is continuous but not Lipschitzian continuous) has attracted many attentions in the literature due to its finite‐time convergence property and good disturbance rejection ability 18 . Motivated by this, based on the model features of attitude system, the finite‐time/fixed‐time attitude controllers were proposed in many works 19‐26 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predefined-time sliding mode controllers for dynamic systems were designed in [36][37][38]. Subsequently, the predefined-time control was used for controlling the attitude of rigid spacecraft and tracking robotic manipulators in [39,40]. Besides, a novel predefined-time consensus protocol was proposed in [41], which ensures a predefinedtime consensus for static topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%