2009 European Control Conference (ECC) 2009
DOI: 10.23919/ecc.2009.7074977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude estimation with accelerometers and gyros using fuzzy tuned Kalman filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, over time the orientation measured by the gyroscope deviates from the actual orientation. A filter such as a Kalman filter could be used to combine the accelerometer and gyroscope readings, producing smoother and drift-free readings [4,5]. The yaw reading of the gyroscope, however, cannot be corrected for drift unless an additional inertial sensor is used (a magnetometer), as an accelerometer does not measure rotation about the yaw axis (see [6] for further information on inertial sensors) A gyroscope has been included in addition to an accelerometer in the control unit specifically so that yaw axis movement can be measured.…”
Section: Inertial Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, over time the orientation measured by the gyroscope deviates from the actual orientation. A filter such as a Kalman filter could be used to combine the accelerometer and gyroscope readings, producing smoother and drift-free readings [4,5]. The yaw reading of the gyroscope, however, cannot be corrected for drift unless an additional inertial sensor is used (a magnetometer), as an accelerometer does not measure rotation about the yaw axis (see [6] for further information on inertial sensors) A gyroscope has been included in addition to an accelerometer in the control unit specifically so that yaw axis movement can be measured.…”
Section: Inertial Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration-based attitude estimation used in this work requires much less computational power than other estimators based on Bayesian statistics such as [5], [11], [14], [20]. However, it has a serious drawback; integration drift gradually accumulates biased measurements and generates a large amount of error as time elapses.…”
Section: Attitude Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IAE and MMAE methods suffer from the disadvantage of large window requirement and lack in convergence due to false model selection respectively [lO]. Furthermore, there have been several advancements to these approaches engaging artificial intelligence techniques, like Fuzzy logic and Neural network as shown in [7,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%